Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26689096›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2016

Individually tailored contrast enhancement in CT pulmonary angiography.

Babs M F Hendriks, Madeleine Kok, Casper Mihl, Sebastiaan C A M Bekkers, Joachim E Wildberger, Marco Das

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03292354 (Personalization of CM Injection Protocols in Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03292354 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Personalization of CM Injection Protocols in Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography

TypeinterventionalSponsorMaastricht University Medical CenterRan2017 to 2018Enrolled327ConditionsCoronary Artery Calcification, Cardiac DiseaseArmsContrast media administration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Tailoring protocols for chest CT applications: when and how?Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Babs M F Hendriks1 Departments of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Madeleine Kok1 Departments of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Casper Mihl1 Departments of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Sebastiaan C A M Bekkers2 CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Joachim E Wildberger1 Departments of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Marco Das1 Departments of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose was to evaluate individually shaped contrast media (CM) delivery in CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for suspected pulmonary embolism (PE).

methods100 consecutive emergency patients with clinical suspicion of PE were evaluated. High-pitch CTPA was performed on a second-generation dual-source CT using the following parameters: 100 kV, 200-250 mAsref, rotation time 0.28 s, 128 × 0.6 mm col. and image reconstruction 1.0/0.8 mm (B30f). Group 1 (n = 50) then received a fixed CM bolus (300 = mgI ml(-1), volume = 90 ml and flow rate = 6 ml s(-1)); Group 2 (n = 50) received a body weight-adapted CM bolus determined by dedicated contrast injection software. For analysis, groups were further subdivided into low-weight (40-75 kg) and high-weight (76-117 kg) groups. Technical image quality was graded using a four-point Likert scale (1 = non-diagnostic; 2 = diagnostic; 3 = good and 4 = excellent image quality) at the level of the pulmonary trunk and pulmonary arteries. Objective image quality analysis was performed by measuring contrast enhancement in Hounsfield units (HU) at the same levels. Attenuation levels > 180 HU were considered diagnostic.

resultsAll examinations were graded as diagnostic at each level. The individual minimum pulmonary attenuation was 184 and 270 HU for Group 1 and 2, respectively. Mean attenuation was as follows: Group 1: 475 ± 105 HU (40-75 kg) and 402 ± 115 HU (76-117 kg), p < 0.03. Group 2: 424 ± 76 HU (40-75 kg) and 418 ± 100 HU (76-117 kg), p = 0.8. For Group 2, CM volumes were: 55 ± 5 ml (40-75 kg) and 66 ± 5 ml (76-117 kg), leading to 16-51% CM reduction.

conclusionEven under emergency conditions, individualized CM protocols can provide diagnostic and robust image quality in CTPA for PE with a substantial reduction of CM volume for lower weight patients, compared with a fixed CM protocol. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: CM volume can substantially be reduced by using individualized CM protocols in CT angiography for PE without compromising the diagnostic image quality.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaImage EnhancementTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesPulmonary ArteryPulmonary EmbolismReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID26689096
PMCPMC4985462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.