Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26689091›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2016

Current status of cranial stereotactic radiosurgery in the UK.

Alexis Dimitriadis, Karen J Kirkby, Andrew Nisbet, Catharine H Clark

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Impact of prescription isodose level and collimator selection on dose homogeneity and plan quality in robotic radiosurgery.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Are respiratory disorders risk factors for troublesome low-back pain? A study of a general population cohort in Sweden.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alexis Dimitriadis1 Department of Physics, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4507-0734
Karen J Kirkby4 Manchester Academic Science, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Andrew Nisbet1 Department of Physics, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Catharine H Clark2 Department of Medical Physics, Royal County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK.
National Physical Laboratory · GBRoyal Surrey County Hospital · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate and benchmark the current clinical and dosimetric practices in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the UK.

methodsA detailed questionnaire was sent to 70 radiotherapy centres in the UK. 97% (68/70) of centres replied between June and December 2014.

results21 centres stated that they are practising SRS, and a further 12 centres plan to start SRS by the end of 2016. The most commonly treated indications are brain metastases and acoustic neuromas. A large range of prescription isodoses that range from 45% to 100% between different radiotherapy centres was seen. Ionization chambers and solid-water phantoms are used by the majority of centres for patient-specific quality assurance, and thermoplastic masks for patient immobilization are more commonly used than fixed stereotactic frames. The majority of centres perform orthogonal kilovoltage X-rays for localization before and during delivery. The acceptable setup accuracy reported ranges from 0.1 to 2 mm with a mean of 0.8 mm.

conclusionSRS has been increasing in use in the UK and will continue to increase in the next 2 years. There is no current consensus between SRS centres as a whole, or even between SRS centres with the same equipment, on the practices followed. This indicates the need for benchmarking and standardization in SRS practices within the UK. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This article outlines the current practices in SRS and provides a benchmark for reference and comparison with future research in this technique.

Indexed as

Cranial IrradiationHumansPractice Patterns, Physicians'RadiosurgerySurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID26689091
PMCPMC4985193
OpenAlexW2245752554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.