Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26688785›Full record

ArticleCurrent pharmacology reports2015

NSAIDs and Colorectal Cancer Control: Promise and Challenges.

George J Tsioulias, Mae F Go, Basil Rigas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current pharmacology reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The Protective Role of Probiotics against Colorectal Cancer.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Does MutatedCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Modulating the wnt signaling pathway with small molecules.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

George J TsiouliasDepartment of Surgery, Medical Sciences Building G530, Rutgers Medical School of New Jersey, 185 South Orange Avenue, Newark, NJ 07103, Tel: 973-676-1000 x1801;
Mae F GoGastroenterology Section, VA Southern Nevada Healthcare System, 6900 N. Pecos Rd, North Las Vegas, NV 89086, Tel: 702-791-9000;
Basil RigasStony Brook University, HSC, L4, Room 169, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8430, Tel: 631-638-2141;

Funding

Colon Cancer Prevention with Phospho-SulindacR01CA139454 · NCI · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI RIGAS, BASIL · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA139454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chemoprevention of colorectal cancer (CRC) is a realistic option given the low acceptance and cost of screening colonoscopy. NSAIDs, currently not recommended for CRC prevention, are the most promising agents. Here, we review relevant work and assess the chemopreventive potential of NSAIDs. The chemopreventive efficacy of NSAIDs is established by epidemiological and interventional studies as well as analyses of cardiovascular-prevention randomized clinical trials. The modest chemopreventive efficacy of NSAIDs is compounded by their significant toxicity that can be cumulative. Efforts to overcome these limitations include the use of drug combinations; the emphasis on the early stages of colon carcinogenesis such as aberrant crypt foci, which may require shorter periods of drug administration; and the development of several families of chemically modified NSAIDs such as derivatives of sulindac, nitro-NSAIDs and phospho-NSAIDs, with some of them appearing to have higher safety and efficacy than conventional NSAIDs and thus to be better candidate agents. The successful development of NSAIDs as chemopreventive agents will likely require a combination of the following: identification of subjects at high risk and/or those most likely to benefit from chemoprevention; optimization of the timing, dose and duration of administration of the chemopreventive agent; novel NSAID derivatives and/or combinations of agents; and agents that may prevent other diseases in addition to CRC. Ultimately, the clinical implementation of NSAIDs for the prevention of CRC will depend on a strategy that drastically shifts the currently unacceptable risk/benefit ratio in favor of chemoprevention.

Indexed as

aspirinChemopreventioncolon cancerNSAIDsphospho-sulindacsulindac

Identifiers

PMID26688785
PMCPMC4683110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.