Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26688712›Full record

ArticleEvoDevo2015

An alternative developmental table to describe non-model fish species embryogenesis: application to the description of the Eurasian perch (Perca fluviatilis L. 1758) development.

Maud Alix, Dominique Chardard, Yannick Ledoré, Pascal Fontaine, Berenice Schaerlinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EvoDevo, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mahi-mahi (Coryphaena hippurus) life development: morphological, physiological, behavioral and molecular phenotypes.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maud AlixUR AFPA, Université de Lorraine-INRA, 2 Avenue de la Forêt de Haye, BP 172, 54505 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Dominique ChardardUR AFPA, Université de Lorraine-INRA, 2 Avenue de la Forêt de Haye, BP 172, 54505 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Yannick LedoréUR AFPA, Université de Lorraine-INRA, 2 Avenue de la Forêt de Haye, BP 172, 54505 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Pascal FontaineUR AFPA, Université de Lorraine-INRA, 2 Avenue de la Forêt de Haye, BP 172, 54505 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Berenice SchaerlingerUR AFPA, Université de Lorraine-INRA, 2 Avenue de la Forêt de Haye, BP 172, 54505 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFish correspond to the most diversified phylum among vertebrates with a large variety of species. Even if general features are distinguishable during the embryogenesis, several differences in term of timing, organ implementation or step progression always occur between species. Moreover, the developmental timing of wild non-model fish often presents variability within a species. In that context, it is necessary to define a model of developmental table flexible enough to describe fish development by integrating this variability and allow intra- and inter-specific comparisons. The elaboration of a model passes by the definition of new stages that could be easily observable on individuals. The present study aims at proposing such a model and describing accurately the Eurasian perch (Perca fluviatilis) embryogenesis using microscopic techniques among which time lapse video and histological studies. The Eurasian perch belongs to the Percidae family that includes 235 species classified in 11 genera. It is a member of the Perca gender and inhabits the Northern part of Europe and Asia.

resultsAt 13 °C, P. fluviatilis development elapses for 15 days from the fertilization to the first oral feeding. The staging division first took into account the cellular status to define periods, then the acquisition of new abilities by the embryo to further define stages. It allowed distinguishing two main stages during the cell cleavage period depending on the synchronization of the cell divisions, two stages during the gastrulation period depending on the cell speed migration and five stages during the organogenesis according to the acquisition of key abilities as proposed in the saltatory theory. During each stage, organs implementation was carefully followed with a particular attention for the visual and digestive systems. In addition, our study shows that embryos hatch at various developmental stages while they all begin to feed at a fixed date, 15 days after the fertilization whatever the spawn and the hatching date. These data give arguments to propose the first oral feeding as the best definition of the embryonic-to-larval transition.

conclusionsThe present model of developmental table combines flexibility and accuracy allowing detailed description of non-model fish species and intra- and inter-specific comparisons.

Indexed as

Developmental tableDigestive system ontogenyEmbryogenesis descriptionHistologyPerca fluviatilisVisual system ontogeny

Identifiers

PMID26688712
PMCPMC4683842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.