Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26688700›Full record

ArticleSchool mental health2015

The Brief Intervention for School Clinicians (BRISC): A mixed-methods evaluation of feasibility, acceptability, and contextual appropriateness.

Aaron R Lyon, Eric J Bruns, Kristy Ludwig, Ann Vander Stoep, Michael D Pullmann, Shannon Dorsey, John Eaton, Ethan Hendrix, Elizabeth McCauley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in School mental health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Effectiveness of a Brief Engagement, Problem-Solving, and Triage Strategy for High School Students: Results of a Randomized Study.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2023
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation.Clinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association · 2016
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aaron R LyonUniversity of Washington.
Eric J BrunsUniversity of Washington.
Kristy LudwigUniversity of Washington.
Ann Vander StoepUniversity of Washington.
Michael D PullmannUniversity of Washington.
Shannon DorseyUniversity of Washington.
John EatonUniversity of Washington.
Ethan HendrixUniversity of Washington.
Elizabeth McCauleyUniversity of Washington.

Funding

IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES IRI-MHSR25MH080916 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Byron James Powell · 2009 to 2026
$3.7M
Implementation of a Measurement Feedback System in School Mental HealthK08MH095939 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LYON, AARON ROBERT · 2012 to 2016
$787k
NIMH NIH HHS K08 MH095939NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH080916
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To maximize impact across the broad spectrum of mental health needs exhibited by youth in school settings, interventions must be designed to be effective, efficient, and demonstrate good fit with the educational context. The current paper reports on the second phase of an iterative development process for a short-term, "Tier 2" intervention for use by school-based mental health providers - the Brief Intervention for School Clinicians (BRISC) - using mixed qualitative and quantitative analyses to evaluate feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness while emphasizing student experiences. This phase was intended to yield information to drive further protocol refinement and testing across subsequent phases. We describe the rationale for, development of, and formative testing of the BRISC intervention. Results suggest that BRISC may be feasible to deliver, acceptable to students, and appropriate to the school context. In particular, the BRISC process appears to be effective in enhancing student engagement in the intervention and identifying and addressing individualized student needs. These findings and directions for further enhancing BRISC's potential for positive impact highlight how treatment development may benefit from initial, small-scale evaluations focused both on client and implementation outcomes.

Indexed as

brief interventionimplementationmental healthtier 2

Identifiers

PMID26688700
PMCPMC4683024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.