Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26688616›Full record

ReviewMediators of inflammation2015

In Vivo Experiments with Dental Pulp Stem Cells for Pulp-Dentin Complex Regeneration.

Sunil Kim, Su-Jung Shin, Yunjung Song, Euiseong Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mediators of inflammation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. A Compilation of Study Models for Dental Pulp Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Stem cells and common biomaterials in dentistry: a review study.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Injectable Biomaterials for Dental Tissue Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sunil KimDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Gangnam Severance Dental Hospital, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul 06273, Republic of Korea.
Su-Jung ShinDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Gangnam Severance Dental Hospital, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul 06273, Republic of Korea.
Yunjung SongDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Hallym Hospital, Hallym University, Anyang 14068, Republic of Korea.
Euiseong KimMicroscope Center, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, many studies have examined the pulp-dentin complex regeneration with DPSCs. While it is important to perform research on cells, scaffolds, and growth factors, it is also critical to develop animal models for preclinical trials. The development of a reproducible animal model of transplantation is essential for obtaining precise and accurate data in vivo. The efficacy of pulp regeneration should be assessed qualitatively and quantitatively using animal models. This review article sought to introduce in vivo experiments that have evaluated the potential of dental pulp stem cells for pulp-dentin complex regeneration. According to a review of various researches about DPSCs, the majority of studies have used subcutaneous mouse and dog teeth for animal models. There is no way to know which animal model will reproduce the clinical environment. If an animal model is developed which is easier to use and is useful in more situations than the currently popular models, it will be a substantial aid to studies examining pulp-dentin complex regeneration.

Indexed as

RegenerationStem Cell TransplantationAnimalsDental PulpDentinHumans

Identifiers

PMID26688616
PMCPMC4672145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.