Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26688349›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2016

Regulatory T cell memory.

Michael D Rosenblum, Sing Sing Way, Abul K Abbas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 206 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
206citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

206 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Risk variants disrupting enhancers of TProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Reversing pregnancy-induced B cell sensitization to facilitate the induction of transplant tolerance in postpartum recipients.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Regulatory T cell memory: implications for malaria.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2025
    Review

146 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael D RosenblumDepartment of Dermatology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, USA.
Sing Sing WayDivision of Infectious Diseases and Perinatal Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, USA.
Abul K AbbasDepartment of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, USA.

Funding

Autoimmunity Center of Excellence Clinical Research ProgramUM1AI110498 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI WOFSY, DAVID · 2014 to 2019
$31.4M
Functional Manipulation of Memory Regulatory T cells in SkinDP2AR068130 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ROSENBLUM, MICHAEL DAVID · 2014 to 2014
$2.4M
The Immune Pathogenesis of Prenatal Listeria monocytogenes InfectionR01AI100934 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI WAY, SING SING · 2012 to 2016
$2.3M
Maternal Regulatory T cell antigen-specificityR01AI120202 · NIAID · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI WAY, SING SING · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
Mechanisms of immune regulation in the skinK08AR062064 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ROSENBLUM, MICHAEL DAVID · 2012 to 2016
$670k
CD4 T cells with specificity to noninherited maternal antigen.R21AI112186 · NIAID · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI WAY, SING SING · 2014 to 2015
$429k
Elucidating the Fundamental Biology of Memory Regulatory T cells in SkinR21AR066821 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ROSENBLUM, MICHAEL DAVID · 2014 to 2015
$381k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI100934NIAID NIH HHS R01AI100934NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI120202NIAID NIH HHS R01AI120202NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI112186NIAID NIH HHS R21AI112186NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI110498NIAID NIH HHS UM1AI110498NIAMS NIH HHS DP2 AR068130NIAMS NIH HHS DP2AR068130NIAMS NIH HHS K08 AR062064NIAMS NIH HHS K08AR062064NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR066821NIAMS NIH HHS R21AR066821
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memory for antigen is a defining feature of adaptive immunity. Antigen-specific lymphocyte populations show an increase in number and function after antigen encounter and more rapidly re-expand upon subsequent antigen exposure. Studies of immune memory have primarily focused on effector B cells and T cells with microbial specificity, using prime-challenge models of infection. However, recent work has also identified persistently expanded populations of antigen-specific regulatory T cells that protect against aberrant immune responses. In this Review, we consider the parallels between memory effector T cells and memory regulatory T cells, along with the functional implications of regulatory memory in autoimmunity, antimicrobial host defence and maternal-fetal tolerance. In addition, we discuss emerging evidence for regulatory T cell memory in humans and key unanswered questions in this rapidly evolving field.

Indexed as

FemaleHistocompatibility, Maternal-FetalHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansImmune ToleranceImmunologic MemoryPregnancyT-LymphocytesT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryT-Lymphocyte Subsets

Identifiers

PMID26688349
PMCPMC5113825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.