Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26687857›Full record

ReviewSeminars in nuclear medicine2016

Development of Companion Diagnostics.

David A Mankoff, Christine E Edmonds, Michael D Farwell, Daniel A Pryma

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in nuclear medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Phase I Study ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2021
    Trial
  2. A Virtual Clinical Trial to Detect Changes in Tumor Uptake with PET using Lesion Embedding.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Phase I Trial ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Translational precision medicine: an industry perspective.Journal of translational medicine · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. HyperpolarizedNeoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David A MankoffDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. Electronic address: david.mankoff@uphs.upenn.edu.
Christine E EdmondsDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Michael D FarwellDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Daniel A PrymaDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA CAN CTR SUPPORT GRANTP30CA016520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SHELLEY L BERGER · 1985 to 2026
$222.3M
Advanced PET/CT Imaging for Improving Clinical TrialsU01CA148131 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KINAHAN, PAUL E., LINDEN, HANNAH M · 2010 to 2019
$6.0M
RESEARCH TRACK RADIOLOGY RESIDENCYT32EB004311 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Terence P Gade, Misun Hwang · 2005 to 2026
$4.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016520NCI NIH HHS P30CA016520NCI NIH HHS U01 CA148131NCI NIH HHS U01CA148131NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB004311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of individualized and targeted treatment and precision medicine requires the assessment of potential therapeutic targets to direct treatment selection. The biomarkers used to direct precision medicine, often termed companion diagnostics, for highly targeted drugs have thus far been almost entirely based on in vitro assay of biopsy material. Molecular imaging companion diagnostics offer a number of features complementary to those from in vitro assay, including the ability to measure the heterogeneity of each patient's cancer across the entire disease burden and to measure early changes in response to treatment. We discuss the use of molecular imaging methods as companion diagnostics for cancer therapy with the goal of predicting response to targeted therapy and measuring early (pharmacodynamic) response as an indication of whether the treatment has "hit" the target. We also discuss considerations for probe development for molecular imaging companion diagnostics, including both small-molecule probes and larger molecules such as labeled antibodies and related constructs. We then describe two examples where both predictive and pharmacodynamic molecular imaging markers have been tested in humans: endocrine therapy for breast cancer and human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-targeted therapy. The review closes with a summary of the items needed to move molecular imaging companion diagnostics from early studies into multicenter trials and into the clinic.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsHumansMolecular ImagingMolecular Targeted TherapyPrecision MedicineBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID26687857
PMCPMC4838027
OpenAlexW2190644725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.