Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26687686›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2016

Circulating U2 small nuclear RNA fragments as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in lung cancer patients.

Jens Köhler, Martin Schuler, Thomas Christoph Gauler, Stefanie Nöpel-Dünnebacke, Maike Ahrens, Andreas-Claudius Hoffmann, Stefan Kasper, Felix Nensa, Benedikt Gomez, Maria Hahnemann and 14 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. TEP RNA: a new frontier for early diagnosis of NSCLC.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Circulating MicroRNAs as Cancer Biomarkers in Liquid Biopsies.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jens KöhlerDivision of Thoracic Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122, Essen, Germany. jens.koehler@uk-essen.de.
Martin SchulerDivision of Thoracic Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122, Essen, Germany.
Thomas Christoph GaulerDivision of Thoracic Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122, Essen, Germany.
Stefanie Nöpel-DünnebackeDepartment of Molecular Gastrointestinal Oncology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Maike AhrensMedizinisches Proteom-Center, Bioinformatics/Biostatistics, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Andreas-Claudius HoffmannDivision of Thoracic Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122, Essen, Germany.
Stefan KasperDivision of Thoracic Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122, Essen, Germany.
Felix NensaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Benedikt GomezDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Maria HahnemannDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Frank BreitenbuecherDivision of Thoracic Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122, Essen, Germany.
Danjouma CheufouDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Ruhrlandklinik, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Filiz ÖzkanDepartment of Interventional Pneumonology, Ruhrlandklinik, West German Lung Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Kaid DarwicheDepartment of Interventional Pneumonology, Ruhrlandklinik, West German Lung Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Mathias HoiczykDivision of Thoracic Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122, Essen, Germany.
Henning ReisInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Stefan WelterDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Ruhrlandklinik, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Wilfried Ernst Erich EberhardtDivision of Thoracic Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122, Essen, Germany.
Martin EisenacherMedizinisches Proteom-Center, Bioinformatics/Biostatistics, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Helmut TeschlerDepartment of Pneumonology, Ruhrlandklinik, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Georgios StamatisDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Ruhrlandklinik, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Wolff SchmiegelDepartment of Internal Medicine, Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Stephan Albrecht HahnDepartment of Molecular Gastrointestinal Oncology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Alexander BaraniskinDepartment of Molecular Gastrointestinal Oncology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
University of Duisburg-Essen · DERuhrlandklinik · DERuhr University Bochum · DEDeutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLung cancer accounts for one in five cancer deaths. Broad screening strategies for high-risk populations are unavailable, and the validation of biomarkers for early cancer detection remains a prime interest. Therefore, we investigated the value of circulating U2 small nuclear RNA fragments (RNU2-1f) as a biomarker for diagnosis, prognosis estimation and treatment monitoring in a large lung cancer cohort.

methodsWe determined RNU2-1f abundance in sera of patients with treatment-naive lung cancer (n = 211, 25.6 % early stage), chronic lung disease (n = 56) and healthy controls (n = 58) by reverse transcription quantitative PCR. Initial levels and changes after one chemotherapy cycle were correlated with treatment outcomes in patient subsets.

resultsRelative serum RNU2-1f expression levels (REL) were elevated in lung cancer patients compared with patients with chronic lung disease and healthy controls (p < 0.0001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the complete data set (lung cancer vs. healthy) was 0.91 (95 % CI 0.87-0.95). By applying a REL of -4.505 as diagnostic cutoff (Youden's criterion), sensitivity and specificity reached 0.86 and 0.81, respectively. To determine the generalization error, in a subsampling study, sensitivity and specificity were estimated as 0.82 and 0.77 for the application to future, independent samples. High initial RNU2-1f REL were associated with shorter median survival in stage IIIB/IV disease (RNU2-1fhigh = 228 days/RNU2-1flow = 484 days; p = 0.009, log-rank test, HR1.43 95 % CI 1.23-1.66). Multivariate analysis confirmed RNU2-1f as an independent prognostic factor. Patients with subsequent RNU2-1f reduction had a trend toward better treatment outcome.

conclusionsSerum RNU2-1f may serve as a biomarker for lung cancer detection, prognosis prediction and treatment monitoring.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCarcinoma, Small CellCase-Control StudiesChronic DiseaseFemaleGermanyHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLung DiseasesLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorRNA, Small NuclearU2 small nuclear RNADiagnosticLung cancerPrognosticRNU2-1fSerum biomarkerTreatment monitoring

Identifiers

PMID26687686
PMCPMC11819072
OpenAlexW2266419055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.