Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26687460›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials2017

Safety of intradiscal injection and biocompatibility of polyester amide microspheres in a canine model predisposed to intervertebral disc degeneration.

Nicole Willems, George Mihov, Guy C M Grinwis, Maarten van Dijk, Detlef Schumann, Clemens Bos, Gustav J Strijkers, Wouter J A Dhert, Björn P Meij, Laura B Creemers and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Proteomic comparison between physiological degeneration and needle puncture model of disc generation disease.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole WillemsDepartment of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, 3584, CM, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
George MihovR&D Orthopedics, DSM Biomedical materials B.V., 6167, RA, Geleen, The Netherlands.
Guy C M GrinwisDepartment of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Maarten van DijkR&D Orthopedics, DSM Biomedical materials B.V., 6167, RA, Geleen, The Netherlands.
Detlef SchumannR&D Orthopedics, DSM Biomedical materials B.V., 6167, RA, Geleen, The Netherlands.
Clemens BosImaging Division, University Medical Center, 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Gustav J StrijkersBiomedical Engineering and Physics, Academic Medical Center (AMC), 1100, DE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wouter J A DhertDepartment of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, 3584, CM, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Björn P MeijDepartment of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, 3584, CM, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Laura B CreemersDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center, 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marianna A TryfonidouDepartment of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, 3584, CM, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Utrecht University · NLDSM (Netherlands) · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLAcademic Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repair of degenerated intervertebral discs (IVD) might be established via intradiscal delivery of biologic therapies. Polyester amide polymers (PEA) were evaluated for in vitro cytotoxicity and in vivo biocompatibility, and thereafter intradiscal application of PEA microspheres (PEAMs) in a canine model predisposed to IVD degeneration at long-term (6 months) follow-up. PEA extracts did not induce cytotoxicity in mouse fibroblast cells (microscopy and XTT assay), while a slight foreign body reaction was demonstrated by histopathology after intramuscular implantation in rabbits. Intradiscal injection of a volume of 40 µL through 26 and 27G needles induced no degenerative changes in acanine model susceptible to IVD disease. Although sham-injected IVDs showed increased CAV1 expression compared with noninjected IVDs, which may indicate increased cell senescence, these findings were not supported by immunohistochemistry, biomolecular analysis of genes related to apoptosis, biochemical and histopathological results. PEAM-injected IVDs showed significantly higher BAX/BCL2 ratio vs sham-injected IVDs suggestive of an anti-apoptotic effect of the PEAMs. These findings were not supported by other analyses (clinical signs, disc height index, T2 values, biomolecular and biochemical analyses, and IVD histopathology). PEAs showed a good cytocompatibility and biocompatibility. PEAMs are considered safe sustained release systems for intradiscal delivery of biological treatments. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 105B: 707-714, 2017.

Indexed as

Materials TestingMicrospheresAnimalsApoptosisbcl-2-Associated X ProteinDisease Models, AnimalDogsDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalGene Expression RegulationIntervertebral Disc DegenerationMicePolyestersRabbitsbcl-2-Associated X ProteinPolyestersbiomaterialdogintradiscal deliverymicrospheresnucleus pulposus

Identifiers

PMID26687460
PMCPMC6690078
OpenAlexW2214605497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.