Trial reportThe Lancet. Haematology2015
Sequential azacitidine and lenalidomide in patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukaemia: a single-arm, phase 1/2 study.
Trial report in The Lancet. Haematology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01038635 (Phase I/II Study of the Combination of 5-azacitidine With Lenalidomide in Patients With High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase I/II Study of the Combination of 5-azacitidine With Lenalidomide in Patients With High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) and Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Azacitidine with or without lenalidomide in higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome & low blast acute myeloid leukemia.Haematologica · 2019Trial
- Maintenance therapy with alternating azacitidine and lenalidomide in elderly fit patients with poor prognosis acute myeloid leukemia: a phase II multicentre FILO trial.Blood cancer journal · 2017Trial
- DD-PRiSM: a deep learning framework for decomposition and prediction of synergistic drug combinations.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- A case of chronic neutrophilic leukemia and multiple myeloma showing the benefits of lenalidomide and cyclophosphamide therapy in treating both conditions.American journal of hematology · 2022Article
- High efficacy of azacitidine combined with homoharringtonine, idarubicin, and cytarabine in newly diagnosed patients with AML: A single arm, phase 2 trial.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Lenalidomide Plus Decitabine Treatment in a Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patient With Deletion 5q and Excess Blasts.Journal of hematology · 2020Article
- Article
- Hypomethylating agent combination strategies in myelodysplastic syndromes: hopes and shortcomings.Leukemia & lymphoma · 2017Review
- Targeted therapies in the treatment of adult acute myeloid leukemias: current status and future perspectives.International journal of hematologic oncology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe standard of care for myelodysplastic syndromes is hypomethylating agents such as azacitidine. However, responses to azacitidine are generally temporary, and outcomes after hypomethylating agent failure are dismal. Therefore, the development of more effective treatments is crucial to improve outcomes in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. We aimed to assess azacitidine and lenalidomide in patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukaemia.
methodsWe did this single-arm phase 1/2 study at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, TX, USA. Patients of any age were eligible for phase 1 and 2a if they had relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndrome with bone marrow blasts more than 10%. For phase 2b, eligible participants were previously untreated with myelodysplastic syndrome with an International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) score of intermediate-1 or higher with up to 30% blasts. All participants received 75 mg/m(2) azacitidine once a day for days 1-5 for each 28 day cycle. We gave patients oral lenalidomide for 5 or 10 days starting on day 6. We assessed seven lenalidomide doses in a 3 + 3 phase 1 design (n=28). The primary endpoint in phase 1 was the maximum tolerated dose, and the primary endpoint in phase 2 was overall survival. Outcome analyses were by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01038635.
findingsBetween Dec 30, 2009, and June, 17, 2013, we enrolled 88 patients (28 in phase 1 and 60 in phase 2). One patient unexpectedly died in the phase 1 study at the highest dose level, six more patients were recruited with no further serious adverse events. We recorded no dose-limiting toxic effects, and the maximum tolerated dose of lenalidomide in combination with azacitidine in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia and myelodysplastic syndrome was initially established at 50 mg per day for 10 days. In the first 20 patients in phase 2, we noted a high rate of myelosuppression and myelosuppression-related toxic effects; therefore, we amended the lenalidomide dose to 25 mg per day for 5 days. We also adjusted the inclusion criteria to include patients with less than 30% blasts to focus mainly on patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Median overall survival was 75 weeks (IQR 25-not reached) for the 40 patients in phase 2b. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events overall were neutropenic fever (n=27) and pneumonia (n=18).
interpretationWe have identified a safe and active sequential treatment combination of azacitidine and lenalidomide for patient with myelodysplastic syndrome and have preliminary evidence that this dose is also safe for patients with acute myeloid leukaemia.
fundingMD Anderson Cancer Center and Celgene.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.