ArticleScientific reports2015
Using aptamers to elucidate esophageal cancer clinical samples.
Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preliminary assessment of biodistribution and targeting of the fluorescent molecular probe Cy7-SYL3C in an EpCAM-positive colorectal cancer mouse model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Dynamic PET Imaging of EpCAM-Positive Colorectal Cancer Using Radiolabeled DTN-SYL3C Aptamer Conjugates.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Advances of aptamers in esophageal cancer diagnosis, treatment and drug delivery.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2025Review
- Molecular Targets of Aptamers in Gastrointestinal Cancers: Cancer Detection, Therapeutic Applications, and Associated Mechanisms.Journal of Cancer · 2023Review
- Next RNA Therapeutics: The Mine of Non-Coding.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Review
- Review
- Selection and characterization of DNA aptamer against glucagon receptor by cell-SELEX.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Aptahistochemistry in diagnostic pathology: technical scrutiny and feasibility.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2017Review
- Single cell biology beyond the era of antibodies: relevance, challenges, and promises in biomedical research.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2017Review
- Molecular Elucidation of Disease Biomarkers at the Interface of Chemistry and Biology.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) is closely correlated with the occurrence and development of various cancers of epithelial origin. This study tested, for the first time, the ability of EpCAM aptamer SYL3C to detect EpCAM expression in 170 cases of esophageal cancer (EC) and precancerous lesions, as well as 20 cases of EC series samples, using immunofluorescence imaging analysis. Corresponding antibodies were used as control. EpCAM overexpression was 98% in both esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EACA) and 100% in metastasis, but no EpCAM overexpression was detected in undifferentiated EC (UEC). Significant differences were noted among various stages of differentiation (p < 0.05) with the degree of differentiation inversely correlated with the expression of EpCAM. Overexpressed EpCAM was detected in severe dysplasia, but negative in mild to moderate dysplasia and benign esophageal lesions. In a competitive binding experiment, EpCAM aptamer generated a staining pattern similar to that of antibody, but the binding sites with EpCAM were different. Based on these results, it can be concluded that EpCAM is suitable for use as an EC biomarker, therapeutic target, and effective parameter for tumor transfer and prognosis evaluation by aptamer SYL3C staining.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.