Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26687117›Full record

ArticleFamilial cancer2016

Gatekeeper role of gastroenterologists and surgeons in recognising and discussing familial colorectal cancer.

Kirsten F L Douma, Evelien Dekker, Ellen M A Smets, Cora M Aalfs

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Familial cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04533555 (Randomized Trial of Universal vs. Guideline-directed Germline Testing Among Young Adults With Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04533555 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Trial of Universal vs. Guideline-directed Germline Testing Among Young Adults With Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2020 to 2025Enrolled749ConditionsCancerArmsBroad gene panel for young adult cancers, Standard
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kirsten F L DoumaDepartment of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. k.f.douma@amc.uva.nl.
Evelien DekkerDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ellen M A SmetsDepartment of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cora M AalfsDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to gain insight into the gatekeeper role of surgeons and gastroenterologists (including residents) during a first consultation at a tertiary gastro-intestinal centre regarding referral for genetic counselling, and to test the feasibility of a checklist for indications for referral. Consecutive patients were invited before and after introduction of a checklist, to complete a questionnaire assessing their perception of discussing cancer genetic topics. Initial consultations were audiotaped to assess the quality of this discussion by gastroenterologists and surgeons. Data on completeness of the checklist and referral were collected from medical files. No significant differences were found between the Before and After group regarding patients' reports of discussing cancer in the family (77%, n = 34 vs 89%, n = 33, p = 0.16). In 28% (n = 10) of the audiotaped consultations family history was adequately discussed, in 58% (n = 21) it was considered inadequate and in 14% (n = 5) of consultations it was not discussed at all. A checklist was present in 53% (n = 27) of the medical files. Of these, 5 (19%) were incomplete. Gastroenterologists and surgeons (in training) have difficulty in fulfilling their gatekeeper role of recognizing patients at familial risk for CRC. Although they often discuss familial cancer during the initial consultation, their exploration seems insufficient to reveal indications for referral for genetic counselling. Therefore, healthcare professionals should not only understand genetics and the importance of cancer family history, but also be effective in the communication of this subject to enable more adequate referral of patients for genetic counselling.

Indexed as

GastroenterologistsGenetic CounselingReferral and ConsultationSurgeonsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsFamilyFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsSurveys and QuestionnairesGastroenterologyGenetic testingHealth communicationHereditary colorectal neoplasmsRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID26687117
PMCPMC4803823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.