Trial reportLancet (London, England)2016
Patient-reported outcomes with anastrozole versus tamoxifen for postmenopausal patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with lumpectomy plus radiotherapy (NSABP B-35): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial.
Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00053898 (A Clinical Trial Comparing Anastrozole With Tamoxifen in Postmenopausal Patients With Ductal Carcinoma in Situ), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Clinical Trial Comparing Anastrozole With Tamoxifen in Postmenopausal Patients With Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS) Undergoing Lumpectomy With Radiation Therapy
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quality of life issues in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Economic and Humanistic Burden of Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review of Large Sample Studies.PharmacoEconomics · 2016Pooled it
- Behavioral and health outcomes from the NRG Oncology/NSABP B-36 trial comparing two different adjuvant therapy regimens for early-stage node-negative breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2022Trial
- Investigating the effectiveness of adjuvant therapy for patients with hormone receptor-positive ductal carcinoma in situ.PloS one · 2022Trial
- Visualizing adverse events in clinical trials using correspondence analysis with R-package visae.BMC medical research methodology · 2021Trial
- Quality of life under extended continuous versus intermittent adjuvant letrozole in lymph node-positive, early breast cancer patients: the SOLE randomised phase 3 trial.British journal of cancer · 2019Trial
- Systemic and local effects of vaginal dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA): NCCTG N10C1 (Alliance).Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018Trial
- Early participant-reported symptoms as predictors of adherence to anastrozole in the International Breast Cancer Intervention Studies II.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2018Trial
- Late distant recurrence prediction model in premenopausal women with ER-positive/HER 2-negative breast cancer: A multicenter retrospective study.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Article
- Analyses of adverse events and patient-reported outcomes with the toxicity index in cancer clinical trials.Cancer · 2025Review
- The Burden of Illness of Treatment-Induced Vasomotor Symptoms in Individuals with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Dynamic Risk Prediction of Treatment Discontinuation Using Patient-Reported Outcomes Data in the Phase III NSABP B-35 Trial.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2023Article
- Non-systemic Approaches for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Exploring the Potential of Ultra-flexible Combisomes as a Novel Drug Delivery Strategy-a Review.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2023Review
- Article
- Review
- Molecular subtyping reveals uniqueness of prognosis in breast ductal carcinoma in situ patients with lumpectomy.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2022Article
- Association of treatment-emergent symptoms identified by patient-reported outcomes with adjuvant endocrine therapy discontinuation.NPJ breast cancer · 2022Article
- Effects of Endocrine Therapy on Cognitive Function in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Cancers · 2022Review
- Toxicity Index, Patient-Reported Outcomes, and Early Discontinuation of Endocrine Therapy for Breast Cancer Risk Reduction in NRG Oncology/NSABP B-35.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
19 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe NSABP B-35 trial compared 5 years of treatment with anastrozole versus tamoxifen for reducing subsequent occurrence of breast cancer in postmenopausal patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. This report assesses the effect of these drugs on quality of life and symptoms.
methodsThe study was done at 333 hospitals in North America. Postmenopausal women with hormone-positive ductal carcinoma in situ treated by lumpectomy with clear resection margins and whole breast irradiation were randomly assigned to receive either tamoxifen (20 mg/day) or anastrazole (1 mg/day) for 5 years, stratified by age (<60 years vs ≥60 years). Patients and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. Patients completed questionnaires at baseline and every 6 months thereafter for 6 years. The primary outcomes were SF-12 physical and mental health component scale scores, and vasomotor symptoms (as per the BCPT symptom scale). Secondary outcomes were vaginal symptoms and sexual functioning. Exploratory outcomes were musculoskeletal pain, bladder symptoms, gynaecological symptoms, cognitive symptoms, weight problems, vitality, and depression. We did the analyses by intention to treat, including patients who completed questionnaires at baseline and at least once during follow-up. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00053898.
findingsBetween Jan 6, 2003, and June 15, 2006, 3104 patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 1193 were included in the quality-of-life substudy: 601 assigned to tamoxifen and 592 assigned to anastrozole. We detected no significant difference between treatment groups for: physical health scores (mean severity score 46·72 for tamoxifen vs 45·85 for anastrozole; p=0·20), mental health scores (52·38 vs 51·48; p=0·38), energy and fatigue (58·34 vs 57·54; p=0·86), or symptoms of depression (6·19 vs 6·39; p=0·46) over 5 years. Vasomotor symptoms (1·33 vs 1·17; p=0·011), difficulty with bladder control (0·96 vs 0·80; p=0·0002), and gynaecological symptoms (0·29 vs 0·18; p<0·0001) were significantly more severe in the tamoxifen group than in the anastrozole group. Musculoskeletal pain (1·50 vs 1·72; p=0·0006) and vaginal symptoms (0·76 vs 0·86; p=0·035) were significantly worse in the anastrozole group than in the tamoxifen group. Sexual functioning did not differ significantly between the two treatments (43·65 vs 45·29; p=0·56). Younger age was significantly associated with more severe vasomotor symptoms (mean severity score 1·45 for age <60 years vs 0·65 for age ≥60 years; p=0·0006), vaginal symptoms (0·98 vs 0·65; p<0·0001), weight problems (1·32 vs 1·02; p<0·0001), and gynaecological symptoms (0·26 vs 0·22; p=0·014).
interpretationGiven the similar efficacy of tamoxifen and anastrozole for women older than age 60 years, decisions about treatment should be informed by the risk for serious adverse health effects and the symptoms associated with each drug. For women younger than 60 years old, treatment decisions might be driven by efficacy (favouring anastrozole); however, if the side-effects of anastrozole are intolerable, then switching to tamoxifen is a good alternative.
fundingUS National Cancer Institute, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.