Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26686957›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2016

Anastrozole versus tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with ductal carcinoma in situ undergoing lumpectomy plus radiotherapy (NSABP B-35): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial.

Richard G Margolese, Reena S Cecchini, Thomas B Julian, Patricia A Ganz, Joseph P Costantino, Laura A Vallow, Kathy S Albain, Patrick W Whitworth, Mary E Cianfrocca, Adam M Brufsky and 9 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 93 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
17.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00053898 phase3completednot on this map

A Clinical Trial Comparing Anastrozole With Tamoxifen in Postmenopausal Patients With Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS) Undergoing Lumpectomy With Radiation Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorNSABP Foundation IncRan2003 to 2016Enrolled3,104ConditionsBreast CancerArmsanastrozole, tamoxifen citrate, Radiation Therapy
NCT03002766 phase2completednot on this map

Ten Years Results of a Score System to Address Adjuvant Therapies After Breast Conserving Surgery for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast.

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, MilanoRan2000 to 2006Enrolled224ConditionsCarcinoma BreastArmsBreast conservative surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 194 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Quality of life issues in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Active Monitoring versus Surgical Excision for Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2026
    Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Richard G MargoleseNRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. Electronic address: richard.margolese@mcgill.ca.
Reena S CecchiniNRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Thomas B JulianNRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Surgical Oncology, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Patricia A GanzNRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Joseph P CostantinoNRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Laura A VallowNRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Kathy S AlbainNRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; SWOG, San Antonio, TX, USA; Department of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Patrick W WhitworthNRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; ALLIANCE/ACOSOG, Chicago, IL, USA; Nashville Breast Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Mary E CianfroccaNRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; SWOG, San Antonio, TX, USA; ECOG/ACRIN, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Hematology/Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ, USA.
Adam M BrufskyNRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Hematology/Oncology, Magee Womens Hospital/University of Pittsburgh Department of Hematology/Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Howard M GrossNRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Dayton Physicians LLC, Dayton, OH, USA.
Gamini S SooriNRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium, Omaha, NE, USA.
Judith O HopkinsNRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; SCOR NCORP, Winston Salem, NC, USA; Department of Hematology/Oncology, Forsyth Regional Cancer Center, Winston Salem, NC, USA.
Louis FehrenbacherNRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California Vallejo, CA, USA.
Keren SturtzNRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Medical Oncology Colorado Cancer Research Program, Denver, CO, USA.
Timothy F WozniakNRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; CCOP, Christiana Care Health Systems, Newark, DE, USA.
Thomas E SeayNRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Atlanta Regional Community Clinical Oncology Program, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Eleftherios P MamounasNRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; UF Health Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL, USA.
Norman WolmarkNRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Surgical Oncology, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
NRG Oncology · USNSABP Foundation · USDayton Physicians Network · USKaiser Permanente Vallejo Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Florida Health · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
SWOG Network Group Operations Center of the NCTNU10CA180888 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI PRIMO N. LARA · 2014 to 2026
$152.1M
Statistics CoreU10CA180822 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI James J. Dignam, GREG YOTHERS · 2014 to 2026
$146.4M
NRG Oncology NCORP Research Base-BIQSFPUG1CA189867 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Deborah Watkins Bruner, Lisa A. Kachnic · 2014 to 2026
$140.5M
NRG Oncology Biospecimen BankU24CA196067 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Tanner J. Freeman, Nilsa Del Carmen Ramirez Milan · 2015 to 2026
$42.6M
Western States Cancer Research NCORPUG1CA189805 · NCI · WESTERN STATES CANCER RESEARCH NCORP · PI Nicholas DiBella MD · 2014 to 2026
$12.0M
NSABP Biological Specimen BanksU24CA114732 · NCI · NSABP FOUNDATION, INC. · PI WOLMARK, NORMAN · 2005 to 2014
$9.4M
NCI NIH HHS U10CA-114732NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180822NCI NIH HHS U10CA-180822NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS U10CA-180868NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180888NCI NIH HHS U10CA-189867NCI NIH HHS U10CA-196067NCI NIH HHS U24 CA114732NCI NIH HHS U24 CA196067NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189805NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189867
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuctal carcinoma in situ is currently managed with excision, radiotherapy, and adjuvant hormone therapy, usually tamoxifen. We postulated that an aromatase inhibitor would be safer and more effective. We therefore undertook this trial to compare anastrozole versus tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with ductal carcinoma in situ undergoing lumpectomy plus radiotherapy.

methodsThe double-blind, randomised, phase 3 National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-35 trial was done in 333 participating NSABP centres in the USA and Canada. Postmenopausal women with hormone-positive ductal carcinoma in situ treated by lumpectomy with clear resection margins and whole-breast irradiation were enrolled and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either oral tamoxifen 20 mg per day (with matching placebo in place of anastrozole) or oral anastrozole 1 mg per day (with matching placebo in place of tamoxifen) for 5 years. Randomisation was stratified by age (<60 vs ≥60 years) and patients and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was breast cancer-free interval, defined as time from randomisation to any breast cancer event (local, regional, or distant recurrence, or contralateral breast cancer, invasive disease, or ductal carcinoma in situ), analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00053898, and is complete.

findingsBetween Jan 1, 2003, and June 15, 2006, 3104 eligible patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the two treatment groups (1552 to tamoxifen and 1552 to anastrozole). As of Feb 28, 2015, follow-up information was available for 3083 patients for overall survival and 3077 for all other disease-free endpoints, with median follow-up of 9·0 years (IQR 8·2-10·0). In total, 212 breast cancer-free interval events occurred: 122 in the tamoxifen group and 90 in the anastrozole group (HR 0·73 [95% CI 0·56-0·96], p=0·0234). A significant time-by-treatment interaction (p=0·0410) became evident later in the study. There was also a significant interaction between treatment and age group (p=0·0379), showing that anastrozole is superior only in women younger than 60 years of age. Adverse events did not differ between the groups, except for thrombosis or embolism--a known side-effect of tamoxifen-for which there were 17 grade 4 or worse events in the tamoxifen group versus four in the anastrozole group.

interpretationCompared with tamoxifen, anastrozole treatment provided a significant improvement in breast cancer-free interval, mainly in women younger than 60 years of age. This finding means that women will benefit from having a choice of effective agents for ductal carcinoma in situ.

fundingUS National Cancer Institute and AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAge FactorsAnastrozoleAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAromatase InhibitorsBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCombined Modality TherapyDouble-Blind MethodEmbolismFemaleHumansMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedNitrilesPostmenopauseAnastrozoleAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAromatase InhibitorsNitrilesTamoxifenTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID26686957
PMCPMC4792688
OpenAlexW2189712549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.