Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26686873›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2016

Robot-assisted surgery for the radical treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis with colorectal involvement: short- and mid-term surgical and functional outcomes.

Luca Morelli, Alessandra Perutelli, Matteo Palmeri, Simone Guadagni, Maria Donatella Mariniello, Gregorio Di Franco, Vito Cela, Benedetta Brundu, Maria Giovanna Salerno, Giulio Di Candio and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Do People Trust in Robot-Assisted Surgery? Evidence from Europe.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Luca MorelliGeneral Surgery Unit, Department of Oncology Transplantation and New Technologies, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Alessandra Perutelli2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
Matteo PalmeriGeneral Surgery Unit, Department of Oncology Transplantation and New Technologies, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56124, Pisa, Italy. palmeri.matteo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9343-278X
Simone GuadagniGeneral Surgery Unit, Department of Oncology Transplantation and New Technologies, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Maria Donatella MarinielloGeneral Surgery Unit, Department of Oncology Transplantation and New Technologies, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Gregorio Di FrancoGeneral Surgery Unit, Department of Oncology Transplantation and New Technologies, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Vito CelaDivision of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Benedetta BrunduObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Department of Fetal-Maternal Medicine, "G. da Saliceto" Hospital, Piacenza, Italy.
Maria Giovanna Salerno2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
Giulio Di CandioGeneral Surgery Unit, Department of Oncology Transplantation and New Technologies, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Franco MoscaEndoCAS (Center of Computer Assisted Surgery), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
University of Pisa · ITOspedale Santa Chiara · ITGuglielmo da Saliceto Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSexual and urinary dysfunctions are complications in radical treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) with colorectal involvement. The aim of this article is to report the preliminary results of our single-institution experience with robotic treatment of DIE, evaluating intraoperative and postoperative surgical outcomes and focusing on the impact of this surgical approach on autonomic functions such as urogenital preservation and sexual well-being.

methodsFrom January 2011 through December 2013, a case series of 10 patients underwent robotic radical treatment of DIE with colorectal resection using the da Vinci System. Surgical data were evaluated, together with perioperative urinary and sexual function as assessed by means of self-administered validated questionnaires.

resultsNone of the patients reported significant postoperative complications. Questionnaires concerning sexual well-being, urinary function, and impact of symptoms on quality of life demonstrated a slight worsening of all parameters 1 month after surgery, while data were comparable to the preoperative period 1 year after surgery. Dyspareunia was the only exception, as it was significantly improved 12 months after surgery.

conclusionsRobot-assisted surgery seems to be advantageous in highly complicated procedures where extensive dissection and proper anatomy re-establishment is required, as in DIE with colorectal involvement. Our preliminary results show that robot-assisted surgery could be associated with a low risk of complications and provide good preservation of urinary function and sexual well-being.

Indexed as

AdultColonEndometriosisFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPerioperative CareQuality of LifeRectumRoboticsTreatment OutcomeUrinationColorectal resectionDeep infiltrating endometriosisNerve-sparing surgeryRobotic surgerySexual dysfunctionUrinary dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID26686873
OpenAlexW2298868618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.