Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26686681›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2015

Application of objective physical activity measurement in an antenatal physical activity consultation intervention: a randomised controlled trial.

Sinead Currie, Marlene Sinclair, Dianne S Liddle, Alan Nevill, Marie H Murphy

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Physical activity and pregnancy outcomes: an expert review.American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sinead CurriePsychology, School of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland. Sinead.currie@stir.ac.uk.
Marlene SinclairInstitute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland. m.sinclair1@ulster.ac.uk.
Dianne S LiddleInstitute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland. sd.liddle@ulster.ac.uk.
Alan NevillFaculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, England. a.m.nevill@wlv.ac.uk.
Marie H MurphyCentre for Physical Activity and Health Research, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland. mh.murphy@ulster.ac.uk.
University of Ulster · GBUniversity of Stirling · GBUniversity of Wolverhampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical Activity (PA) during pregnancy has many health benefits, however, inactivity in this population is common and PA often declines with increasing gestation. PA consultations have been useful in promoting PA in the general population, however their use for addressing PA in pregnancy is unknown. This study aimed to examine if a theory-based intervention using PA consultations would reduce the magnitude of decline in objectively measured PA between the first and third trimesters of pregnancy.

methodsA RCT was carried out in an urban maternity unit in Northern Ireland between September 2012 and June 2013. 109 low-risk, primigravida pregnant women were randomised to a control (n = 54) or intervention group (n = 55). Intervention participants received three face-to-face individual PA consultations. Daily PA was measured in each trimester using seven day accelerometry. The study was approved by a NHS trust (12/NI/0036). PA data in counts per minute (CPM) were categorised into intensity using Freedson cut points and mean minutes of PA were compared between groups using repeated measures ANOVA with a sub-analysis stratifying participants per PA level in trimester one.

resultsIntention to treat analysis was performed on data from 97 participants. Time in moderate, vigorous and moderate-vigorous intensity PA (MVPA) significantly declined between trimesters one and three in both groups (P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in PA between groups in any trimester. Women in the intervention group who were less active in trimester one did not demonstrate a significant decline in MVPA throughout pregnancy (in contrast with the decline identified in the more active participants).

conclusionsThe findings indicate that PA consultations were not effective in reducing the decline of MVPA in throughout pregnancy, however, women who were less active in trimester one and received PA consultations had a lesser decrease in MVPA. It is possible that pregnant women, specifically those who are more active at the start of pregnancy, have differing needs for PA behaviour change and maintenance, requiring more intense interventions than less active women.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials Register ISRCTN61829137.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorAdultExerciseFemaleHealth EducationHumansMotor ActivityNorthern IrelandObesityPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal CareReferral and ConsultationSocial SupportTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26686681
PMCPMC4684930
OpenAlexW2203089764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.