Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26686313›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2016

Anastrozole versus tamoxifen for the prevention of locoregional and contralateral breast cancer in postmenopausal women with locally excised ductal carcinoma in situ (IBIS-II DCIS): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

John F Forbes, Ivana Sestak, Anthony Howell, Bernardo Bonanni, Nigel Bundred, Christelle Levy, Gunter von Minckwitz, Wolfgang Eiermann, Patrick Neven, Michael Stierer and 6 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 77 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00072462 phase3completednot on this map

International Breast Cancer Intervention Study II (IBIS-II) (DCIS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorQueen Mary University of LondonRan2003 to 2021Enrolled2,980ConditionsBreast CancerArmstamoxifen citrate, Anastrozole
NCT03002766 phase2completednot on this map

Ten Years Results of a Score System to Address Adjuvant Therapies After Breast Conserving Surgery for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast.

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, MilanoRan2000 to 2006Enrolled224ConditionsCarcinoma BreastArmsBreast conservative surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 198 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 12 institutions in 7 countries.

John F ForbesAustralia and New Zealand Breast Cancer Trials Group, University of Newcastle, Waratah, NSW, Australia.
Ivana SestakCentre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Anthony HowellGenesis Breast Cancer Prevention Centre, Manchester, UK.
Bernardo BonanniDivision of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Nigel BundredSouth Manchester University Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Christelle LevyCentre François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Gunter von MinckwitzGerman Breast Group, Frankfurt, Germany.
Wolfgang EiermannInterdisziplinares Onkologisches Zentrum, Munich, Germany.
Patrick NevenDepartment of Oncology, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Michael StiererAustrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Vienna, Austria.
Chris HolcombeLinda McCartney Centre, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Robert E ColemanDepartment of Oncology and Metabolism, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
Louise JonesBarts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Ian EllisDepartment of Histopathology University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Jack CuzickCentre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. Electronic address: j.cuzick@qmul.ac.uk.
IBIS-II investigators
Queen Mary University of London · GBAustrian Breast & Colorectal Cancer Study Group · ATBreast Cancer Care · GBBreast Cancer Trials · AUCentre François Baclesse · FREuropean Institute of Oncology · ITGerman Breast group · DEKU Leuven · BEUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBWeston Park Cancer Centre · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16891Cancer Research UK 16893Cancer Research UK C569/A16891Cancer Research UK C569/A5032Cancer Research UK C8162/A26893
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThird-generation aromatase inhibitors are more effective than tamoxifen for preventing recurrence in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive invasive breast cancer. However, it is not known whether anastrozole is more effective than tamoxifen for women with hormone-receptor-positive ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Here, we compare the efficacy of anastrozole with that of tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive DCIS.

methodsIn a double-blind, multicentre, randomised placebo-controlled trial, we recruited women who had been diagnosed with locally excised, hormone-receptor-positive DCIS. Eligible women were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio by central computer allocation to receive 1 mg oral anastrozole or 20 mg oral tamoxifen every day for 5 years. Randomisation was stratified by major centre or hub and was done in blocks (six, eight, or ten). All trial personnel, participants, and clinicians were masked to treatment allocation and only the trial statistician had access to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was all recurrence, including recurrent DCIS and new contralateral tumours. All analyses were done on a modified intention-to-treat basis (in all women who were randomised and did not revoke consent for their data to be included) and proportional hazard models were used to compute hazard ratios and corresponding confidence intervals. This trial is registered at the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN37546358.

resultsBetween March 3, 2003, and Feb 8, 2012, we enrolled 2980 postmenopausal women from 236 centres in 14 countries and randomly assigned them to receive anastrozole (1449 analysed) or tamoxifen (1489 analysed). Median follow-up was 7·2 years (IQR 5·6-8·9), and 144 breast cancer recurrences were recorded. We noted no statistically significant difference in overall recurrence (67 recurrences for anastrozole vs 77 for tamoxifen; HR 0·89 [95% CI 0·64-1·23]). The non-inferiority of anastrozole was established (upper 95% CI <1·25), but its superiority to tamoxifen was not (p=0·49). A total of 69 deaths were recorded (33 for anastrozole vs 36 for tamoxifen; HR 0·93 [95% CI 0·58-1·50], p=0·78), and no specific cause was more common in one group than the other. The number of women reporting any adverse event was similar between anastrozole (1323 women, 91%) and tamoxifen (1379 women, 93%); the side-effect profiles of the two drugs differed, with more fractures, musculoskeletal events, hypercholesterolaemia, and strokes with anastrozole and more muscle spasm, gynaecological cancers and symptoms, vasomotor symptoms, and deep vein thromboses with tamoxifen.

conclusionsNo clear efficacy differences were seen between the two treatments. Anastrozole offers another treatment option for postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive DCIS, which may be be more appropriate for some women with contraindications for tamoxifen. Longer follow-up will be necessary to fully evaluate treatment differences.

fundingCancer Research UK, National Health and Medical Research Council Australia, Breast Cancer Research Fund, AstraZeneca, Sanofi Aventis.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnastrozoleAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAromatase InhibitorsBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIntention to Treat AnalysisMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNitrilesPostmenopauseTamoxifenTriazolesAnastrozoleAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAromatase InhibitorsNitrilesTamoxifenTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID26686313
PMCPMC4769326
OpenAlexW2191470295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.