Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26686239›Full record

Observational studyNeurogastroenterology and motility2016

GERD phenotypes from pH-impedance monitoring predict symptomatic outcomes on prospective evaluation.

A Patel, G S Sayuk, V M Kushnir, W W Chan, C P Gyawali

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. ACG Clinical Guidelines: Clinical Use of Esophageal Physiologic Testing.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2020
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. A review of medical therapy for proton pump inhibitor nonresponsive gastroesophageal reflux disease.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A PatelDivision of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
G S SayukDivision of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
V M KushnirDivision of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
W W ChanDivision of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
C P GyawaliDivision of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USJohn Cochran VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Washington University DDRCC Supplemental Equipment RequestP30DK052574 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Nicholas O. Davidson · 2000 to 2026
$30.8M
CLINICAL/LABORATORY TRAINING ACADEMIC GASTROENTEROLOGYT32DK007130 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MATTHEW AARON CIORBA · 1986 to 2026
$8.3M
Pilot Prospective Study of Minor Papilla Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Pancreas DR21DK084413 · NIDDK · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI ROMAGNUOLO, JOSEPH · 2010 to 2011
$443k
NIDDK NIH HHS 5P30DK052574-14NIDDK NIH HHS K23DK84413-4NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK052574NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK084413NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCombinations of reflux parameters (acid exposure time, AET; symptom association probability, SAP) on pH-impedance monitoring describe varying confidence in reflux evidence. We compared outcomes between phenotypes with distinct pre-identified reflux parameters.

methodsIn this observational cohort study, patients undergoing pH-impedance testing over a 5-year period were phenotyped by strength of reflux evidence as strong (abnormal AET, positive SAP), good (abnormal AET, negative SAP), reflux hypersensitivity (RH, normal AET, positive SAP), and equivocal evidence of reflux, and compared to two historical institutional pH monitoring cohorts. Symptom burden (dominant symptom intensity, DSI; global symptom severity, GSS) was assessed by questionnaire at baseline and on prospective follow-up and compared between phenotypes. KEY

resultsOf 94 patients tested off proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, baseline symptom burden was highest with strong reflux evidence and lowest when equivocal (DSI: p = 0.01; GSS: p = 0.03 across groups). After 3.1 ± 0.2 years follow-up, symptomatic improvement with surgical or medical therapy was highest with strong or good evidence, and lowest when equivocal (DSI: p = 0.008; GSS: p = 0.005 across groups). This was most pronounced for typical symptoms (DSI: p = 0.001; GSS: 0.016 across groups), but not atypical symptoms (DSI: p = 0.6; GSS: p = 0.2). For testing on PPI therapy, only GSS followed a similar trend (GSS: p = 0.057, DSI: p = 0.3). Compared to historical cohorts with pH monitoring alone, equivocal evidence for reflux was partly replaced by RH, especially off PPI (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Phenotyping gastroesophageal reflux disease by the strength of reflux evidence on pH-impedance testing off PPI efficiently stratifies symptomatic outcome, especially for typical symptoms, and could be useful in planning management.

Indexed as

Cohort StudiesElectric ImpedanceEsophageal pH MonitoringFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastroesophageal RefluxHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypeProspective StudiesProton Pump InhibitorsTreatment OutcomeProton Pump Inhibitorsgastroesophageal reflux diseasepH-impedance testingstrength of reflux evidencesymptom-reflux association

Identifiers

PMID26686239
PMCPMC4808441
OpenAlexW2217371483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.