Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26685850›Full record

Trial reportClinical oral investigations2016

Assessment of postoperative pain after reciprocating or rotary NiTi instrumentation of root canals: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

João Bosko Formigas Relvas, Mariana Mena Barreto Bastos, André Augusto Franco Marques, Angela Delfina Bitencourt Garrido, Emílio Carlos Sponchiado

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02940704 nacompletednot on this map

Assessment of Postoperative Pain After Using Reciproc Versus One Shape NiTi Systems in Patients With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial (Part I)

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2016 to 2018Enrolled54ConditionsPulpitisArmsReciproc, One Shape
NCT07699432 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Impact of Employing Different Kinematics Within a Single-File System on the Perception of Postoperative Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorJordan University of Science and TechnologyRan2024 to 2026Enrolled75ConditionsRoot Canal Treatment, Postoperative Pain, Apical PeriodontitisArmsTwisted Adaptive motion (TFA), canal pro jeni, forward reciprocation, continuous rotation, Optimum Torque Reverse (OTR)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

João Bosko Formigas RelvasDental School, Federal University of Amazonas, R Mins Waldemar Pedrosa, n. 1539, Praça 14 de Janeiro, Manaus, AM, CEP: 69025-050, Brazil.
Mariana Mena Barreto BastosDental School, Federal University of Amazonas, R Mins Waldemar Pedrosa, n. 1539, Praça 14 de Janeiro, Manaus, AM, CEP: 69025-050, Brazil.
André Augusto Franco MarquesDental School, Federal University of Amazonas, R Mins Waldemar Pedrosa, n. 1539, Praça 14 de Janeiro, Manaus, AM, CEP: 69025-050, Brazil.
Angela Delfina Bitencourt GarridoDental School, Federal University of Amazonas, R Mins Waldemar Pedrosa, n. 1539, Praça 14 de Janeiro, Manaus, AM, CEP: 69025-050, Brazil.
Emílio Carlos SponchiadoDental School, Federal University of Amazonas, R Mins Waldemar Pedrosa, n. 1539, Praça 14 de Janeiro, Manaus, AM, CEP: 69025-050, Brazil. spemilio@me.com.
Universidade Federal do Amazonas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to assess postoperative pain in a prospective randomized clinical trial comparing two groups, using the Reciproc® system in one group and the ProTaper® rotary system in the other. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe study included 78 male patients, aged 18-64 years (mean age of 26 years), with asymptomatic pulp necrosis in mandibular molar teeth (n = 78). The single-session endodontic treatment was performed by a single operator specialized in Endodontics. Mechanical preparation of the root canals was performed using the ProTaper® and Reciproc® instrumentation techniques. Postoperative pain was recorded using a verbal rating scale (VRS) and verbal description with well-defined categories at the three following time intervals: 24 h, 72 h, and 7 days after the endodontic procedure. The assessment of postoperative pain was recorded as no pain, mild pain, moderate pain, and severe pain or flare-up. Data were analyzed using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test with the aid of the STATA® software.

resultsThe incidence of postoperative pain in the ProTaper group (PT) 24 h after the endodontic procedure was 17.9 and 5.1 % after 72 h. In the Reciproc group (RP), the incidence after 24 h was 15.3 and 2.5 % after 72 h. No patients presented severe pain at the time intervals assessed.

conclusionsNo significant difference (p > 0.05) in postoperative pain was found between the ProTaper® and Reciproc® instrumentation technique during endodontic treatment in this study. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: According to our findings and the results of the clinical trial, the occurrence of postoperative pain was low and similar between the reciprocating and rotary techniques during the time intervals assessed. These results are different from basic laboratory studies that affirm that the reciprocating techniques tend to promote more postoperative pain since extrusion of debris is greater.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrazilHumansMaleMiddle AgedMolarNickelPain MeasurementPostoperative PainProspective StudiesRoot Canal PreparationTitaniumNickelTitaniumtitanium nickelideInstrumentationPostoperative painReciprocatingRoot canal treatmentRotary

Identifiers

PMID26685850
OpenAlexW2274893642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.