Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26685214›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer research : MCR2016

Proteomic Characterization of Head and Neck Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts.

Hua Li, Sarah Wheeler, Yongseok Park, Zhenlin Ju, Sufi M Thomas, Michele Fichera, Ann M Egloff, Vivian W Lui, Umamaheswar Duvvuri, Julie E Bauman and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer research : MCR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. ATR inhibition sensitizes HPVOral oncology · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hua LiDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Sarah WheelerDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Yongseok ParkDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Zhenlin JuDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Sufi M ThomasDepartments of Otolaryngology and Cancer Biology, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Michele FicheraDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Ann M EgloffDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Vivian W LuiDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Umamaheswar DuvvuriDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, University Drive Campus, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Julie E BaumanDepartment of Internal Medicine - Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Gordon B MillsDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Department of Systems Biology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Jennifer R GrandisDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California. jennifer.grandis@ucsf.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USThe University of Kansas Cancer Center · USUniversity of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
WILD TYPE P53-BASED ADJUVANT IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR SCCHNP50CA097190 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CHRISTOPHER J. BAKKENIST · 2004 to 2026
$49.6M
PI3K Pathway Mutations in Head and Neck CancerR01DE023685 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI GRANDIS, JENNIFER RUBIN, JOHNSON, DANIEL E · 2014 to 2023
$5.1M
GRPR Signaling in SCCHN: Integration with EGFRR01CA098372 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI GRANDIS, JENNIFER RUBIN · 2004 to 2017
$3.8M
Genomic and Proteomic Biomarkers for Head and Neck Cancer Risk and PrognosisK07CA137140 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI EGLOFF, ANN MARIE · 2009 to 2013
$519k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA137140NCI NIH HHS NCI CA16672NCI NIH HHS NIH K07 CA137140NCI NIH HHS NIH P50CA097190NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA097190NCI NIH HHS R01 CA098372NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE023685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledDespite advances in treatment approaches for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), survival rates have remained stagnant due to the paucity of preclinical models that accurately reflect the human tumor. Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) are an emerging model system where patient tumors are implanted directly into mice. Increased understanding of the application and limitations of PDXs will facilitate their rational use. Studies to date have not reported protein profiles of PDXs. Therefore, we developed a large cohort of HNSCC PDXs and found that tumor take rate was not influenced by the clinical, pathologic, or processing features. Protein expression profiles, from a subset of the PDXs, were characterized by reverse-phase protein array and the data was compared with The Cancer Genome Atlas HNSCC data. Cluster analysis revealed that HNSCC PDXs were more similar to primary HNSCC than to any other tumor type. Interestingly, while a significant fraction of proteins were expressed similarly in both primary HNSCC and PDXs, a subset of proteins/phosphoproteins were expressed at higher (or lower) levels in PDXs compared with primary HNSCC. These findings indicate that the proteome is generally conserved in PDXs, but mechanisms for both positive and negative model selection and/or differences in the stromal components exist. IMPLICATIONS: Proteomic characterization of HNSCC PDXs demonstrates potential drivers for model selection and provides a framework for improved utilization of this expanding model system.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarcinoma, Squamous CellCluster AnalysisDatabases, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMiceNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasm TransplantationProteomicsNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26685214
PMCPMC4794346
OpenAlexW2257359479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.