Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26685082›Full record

Trial reportJournal of palliative medicine2016

Using Nurse Ratings of Physician Communication in the ICU To Identify Potential Targets for Interventions To Improve End-of-Life Care.

Kathleen J Ramos, Lois Downey, Elizabeth L Nielsen, Patsy D Treece, Sarah E Shannon, J Randall Curtis, Ruth A Engelberg

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of palliative medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kathleen J Ramos1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.
Lois Downey1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.
Elizabeth L Nielsen1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.
Patsy D Treece1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.
Sarah E Shannon3 Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Systems, School of Nursing, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.
J Randall Curtis1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.
Ruth A Engelberg1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.

Funding

Randomized trial of an interdisciplinary communication intervention to improve paR01NR005226 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CURTIS, J RANDALL, ENGELBERG, RUTH ANN · 1999 to 2012
$6.7M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR005226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunication among doctors, nurses, and families contributes to high-quality end-of-life care, but is difficult to improve.

objectiveOur objective was to identify aspects of communication appropriate for interventions to improve quality of dying in the intensive care unit (ICU).

methodsThis observational study used data from a cluster-randomized trial of an interdisciplinary intervention to improve end-of-life care at 15 Seattle/Tacoma area hospitals (2003-2008). Nurses completed surveys for patients dying in the ICU. We examined associations between nurse-assessed predictors (physician-nurse communication, physician-family communication) and nurse ratings of patients' quality of dying (nurse-QODD-1).

resultsBased on 1173 nurse surveys, four of six physician-nurse communication topics were positively associated with nurse-QODD-1: family questions, family dynamics, spiritual/religious issues, and cultural issues. Discussions between nurses and physicians about nurses' concerns for patients or families were negatively associated. All physician-family communication ratings, as assessed by nurses, were positively associated with nurse-QODD-1: answering family's questions, listening to family, asking about treatments patient would want, helping family decide patient's treatment wishes, and overall communication. Path analysis suggested overall physician-family communication and helping family incorporate patient's wishes were directly associated with nurse-QODD-1.

conclusionsSeveral topics of physician-nurse communication, as rated by nurses, were associated with higher nurse-rated quality of dying, whereas one topic, nurses' concerns for patient or family, was associated with poorer ratings. Higher nurse ratings of physician-family communication were uniformly associated with higher quality of dying, highlighting the importance of this communication. Physician support of family decision making was particularly important, suggesting a potential target for interventions to improve end-of-life care.

Indexed as

CommunicationAgedAged, 80 and overAttitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to DeathCritical CareFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsInterprofessional RelationsMaleMiddle AgedNursing Staff, HospitalPhysiciansProfessional-Family RelationsQuality Improvement

Identifiers

PMID26685082
PMCPMC4779274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.