Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26685023›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2015

Lung cancer treatment rates and the role of the lung cancer nurse specialist: a qualitative study.

Angela Mary Tod, Judy Redman, Ann McDonnell, Diana Borthwick, John White

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Patients' experience of lung cancer care coordination: a quantitative exploration.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Angela Mary TodSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6336-3747
Judy RedmanCentre for Health and Social Care Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, England.
Ann McDonnellCentre for Health and Social Care Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, England.
Diana BorthwickEdinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland.
John WhiteSt James`s Institute of Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, England.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis qualitative study examines how the Lung Cancer Nurse Specialist (LCNS) role operates and why they may be able to increase access to treatment.

setting4 Hospital NHS Foundation Trusts in England.

designA multiple case study design using semistructured interviews, observation and Framework Analysis techniques.

participantsFour LCNSs, comprised the 'cases'. Twenty four clinicians who worked with the LCNS participated in individual interviews. Six LCNSs took part in a group interview and 60 lung cancer multidisciplinary team (MDT) members and coordinators were observed in the MDT meeting.

resultsThe LCNS is crucial within the MDT and can act as a catalyst to patient access to treatment. The study identified the clinical activity (assessment, managing symptoms, psychological support and information provision) and role characteristics that can facilitate treatment access. These characteristics are the LCNS's presence across the patient pathway, acting as the 'hub' of the MDT, maintaining a holistic patient focus and working to an advanced level of practice. The findings indicate how factors may have a cumulative impact on treatment access.

conclusionsIf UK patient with lung cancer survival rates are to improve in line with comparable countries, we need to employ every advantage. This study demonstrates how the LCNS role may open doors to positive patient outcomes, including treatment. Further research is required to explore patients' experiences, decision-making and attitudes to treatment.

Indexed as

Nurse CliniciansNurse's RoleDecision Support TechniquesEnglandHealth Care SurveysHealth Services AccessibilityHumansLung NeoplasmsNurse-Patient RelationsPatient Care TeamProfessional CompetenceQualitative ResearchSurvival AnalysisQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID26685023
PMCPMC4691737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.