Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26684803›Full record

ArticleTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2016

KRAS mutations in pancreatic circulating tumor cells: a pilot study.

Birte Kulemann, Andrew S Liss, Andrew L Warshaw, Sindy Seifert, Peter Bronsert, Torben Glatz, Martha B Pitman, Jens Hoeppner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pancreatic Cancer and Therapy: Role and Regulation of Cancer Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Experimental hematology & oncology · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Birte KulemannDepartment of Surgery, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Hugstetter Str. 55, D-79106, Freiburg, Germany. birte.kulemann@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
Andrew S LissDepartment of Surgery & Andrew L. Warshaw, MD Institute for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital/ Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Andrew L WarshawDepartment of Surgery & Andrew L. Warshaw, MD Institute for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital/ Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Sindy SeifertDepartment of Surgery, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Hugstetter Str. 55, D-79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Peter BronsertDepartment of Pathology, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.
Torben GlatzDepartment of Surgery, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Hugstetter Str. 55, D-79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Martha B PitmanDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Jens HoeppnerDepartment of Surgery, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Hugstetter Str. 55, D-79106, Freiburg, Germany.
University Medical Center Freiburg · DECenter for Cancer Research · USHarvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is most often diagnosed in a metastatic stage. Circulating tumor cells (CTC) in the blood are hypothesized as the means of systemic dissemination. We aimed to isolate and characterize CTC to evaluate their significance as prognostic markers in PDAC. Blood obtained from healthy donors and patients with PDAC before therapy was filtered with ScreenCell® filtration devices for size-based CTC isolation. Captured cells were analyzed by immunofluorescence for an epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) marker (zinc finger E-box binding homebox 1 (ZEB1)) and an epithelial antigen (cytokeratin (CK)). Molecular analysis of parallel specimens evaluated the KRAS mutation status of the CTC. The survival of each patient after study was recorded. As demonstrated by either cytology or finding of a KRAS mutation, CTC were detected in 18 of 21 patients (86 %) with proven PDAC: 8 out of 10 patients (80 %) with early stage (UICC IIA/IIB) and 10 out of 11 (91 %) with late stage (UICC III/IV) disease. CTC were not found in any of the 10 control patients (p < 0.001). The presence of CTC did not adversely affect median survival: 16 months in CTC-positive (n = 18) vs. 10 months in CTC-negative (n = 3) patients. Neither ZEB1 nor cytological characteristics correlated with overall survival, although ZEB1 was found almost exclusively in CTC of patients with established metastases. Patients with a CTC KRAS mutation (CTC-KRAS (mut)) had a substantially better survival, 19.4 vs. 7.4 months than patients with wild type KRAS (p = 0.015). With ScreenCell filtration, CTC are commonly found in PDAC (86 %). Molecular and genetic characterization, including mutations such as KRAS, may prove useful for prognosis.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingPancreatic NeoplasmsPilot ProjectsPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Circulating tumor cellsMolecular/genetic statusPancreatic cancerPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID26684803
OpenAlexW2210263423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.