Trial reportJournal of neurosurgery2016
Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the fornix for Alzheimer's disease: surgical safety in the ADvance trial.
Trial report in Journal of neurosurgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Twelve Month Double-blind Randomized Controlled Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Safety, Efficacy and Tolerability of Deep Brain Stimulation of the Fornix (DBS-f) in Patients With Mild Probable Alzheimer's Disease
Multi-targets, Single-lead GPi+NBM DBS in Parkinson's Disease With Mild Cognitive Impairment
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Deep brain stimulation of the fornix for Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive outcomes.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Ethical, legal, and sociocultural considerations in neural device explantation: a systematic review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Pooled it
- An updated overview of recent and ongoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) trials in patients with dementia: a systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023Pooled it
- Neural stem/progenitor cell therapy for Alzheimer disease in preclinical rodent models: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Stem cell research & therapy · 2023Pooled it
- Mapping autonomic, mood and cognitive effects of hypothalamic region deep brain stimulation.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2021Trial
- Effect of Age on Clinical Trial Outcome in Participants with Probable Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2021Trial
- A Phase II Study of Fornix Deep Brain Stimulation in Mild Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2016Trial
- Mechanism and progress of deep brain stimulation in the treatment of neurological and psychiatric disorders.MedScience · 2026Review
- Sleep circuit modulation: from animal models to human translation.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026Review
- Article
- Biomarker changes associated with fornix deep brain stimulation in Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- The Potential for Neuromodulation in the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease: A Review of Clinical Trials.Cureus · 2025Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Bilateral Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) for Severe Alzheimer's Disease: A Comparative Analysis of Fornix Versus Basal Ganglia of Meynert.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Observational
- Targeting Neural Oscillations for Cognitive Enhancement in Alzheimer's Disease.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Therapeutic Potential of Experimental Stereotactic Hippocampal Cell Transplant in the Management of Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Deep Brain Stimulation Combined with NMDA Antagonist Therapy in the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease: In Silico Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Establishing connectivity through microdissections of midbrain stimulation-related neural circuits.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Targeting papez circuit for cognitive dysfunction- insights into deep brain stimulation for Alzheimer's disease.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Nonmedication Devices in Development for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports · 2024Review
- Robotic-Assisted Navigation for Stereotactic Neurosurgery: A Cadaveric Investigation of Accuracy, Time, and Radiation.Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
OBJECT This report describes the stereotactic technique, hospitalization, and 90-day perioperative safety of bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the fornix in patients who underwent DBS for the treatment of mild, probable Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS The ADvance Trial is a multicenter, 12-month, double-blind, randomized, controlled feasibility study being conducted to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of DBS of the fornix in patients with mild, probable AD. Intraoperative and perioperative data were collected prospectively. All patients underwent postoperative MRI. Stereotactic analyses were performed in a blinded fashion by a single surgeon. Adverse events (AEs) were reported to an independent clinical events committee and adjudicated to determine the relationship between the AE and the study procedure. RESULTS Between June 6, 2012, and April 28, 2014, a total of 42 patients with mild, probable AD were treated with bilateral fornix DBS (mean age 68.2 ± 7.8 years; range 48.0-79.7 years; 23 men and 19 women). The mean planned target coordinates were x = 5.2 ± 1.0 mm (range 3.0-7.9 mm), y = 9.6 ± 0.9 mm (range 8.0-11.6 mm), z = -7.5 ± 1.2 mm (range -5.4 to -10.0 mm), and the mean postoperative stereotactic radial error on MRI was 1.5 ± 1.0 mm (range 0.2-4.0 mm). The mean length of hospitalization was 1.4 ± 0.8 days. Twenty-six (61.9%) patients experienced 64 AEs related to the study procedure, of which 7 were serious AEs experienced by 5 patients (11.9%). Four (9.5%) patients required return to surgery: 2 patients for explantation due to infection, 1 patient for lead repositioning, and 1 patient for chronic subdural hematoma. No patients experienced neurological deficits as a result of the study, and no deaths were reported. CONCLUSIONS Accurate targeting of DBS to the fornix without direct injury to it is feasible across surgeons and treatment centers. At 90 days after surgery, bilateral fornix DBS was well tolerated by patients with mild, probable AD. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT01608061 ( clinicaltrials.gov ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.