Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26684315›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of pediatrics : WJP2016

Detection of respiratory viruses and bacteria in children using a twenty-two target reverse-transcription real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) panel.

Chelsey Ellis, Amita Misir, Charles Hui, Mona Jabbour, Nicholas Barrowman, Jonathan Langill, Jennifer Bowes, Robert Slinger

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of pediatrics : WJP, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Human Parvoviruses.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2017
    Review
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chelsey EllisChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Amita MisirChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Charles HuiChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Mona JabbourChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Nicholas BarrowmanChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Jonathan LangillChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Jennifer BowesChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Robert SlingerChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. slinger@cheo.on.ca.
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRapid detection of the wide range of viruses and bacteria that cause respiratory infection in children is important for patient care and antibiotic stewardship. We therefore designed and evaluated a ready-to-use 22 target respiratory infection reverse-transcription real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) panel to determine if this would improve detection of these agents at our pediatric hospital.

methodsRT-qPCR assays for twenty-two target organisms were dried-down in individual wells of 96 well plates and saved at room temperature. Targets included 18 respiratory viruses and 4 bacteria. After automated nucleic acid extraction of nasopharyngeal aspirate (NPA) samples, rapid qPCR was performed. RT-qPCR results were compared with those obtained by the testing methods used at our hospital laboratories.

resultsOne hundred fifty-nine pediatric NPA samples were tested with the RT-qPCR panel. One or more respiratory pathogens were detected in 132/159 (83%) samples. This was significantly higher than the detection rate of standard methods (94/159, 59%) (P<0.001). This difference was mainly due to improved RT-qPCR detection of rhinoviruses, parainfluenza viruses, bocavirus, and coronaviruses. The panel internal control assay performance remained stable at room temperature storage over a two-month testing period.

conclusionThe RT-qPCR panel was able to identify pathogens in a high proportion of respiratory samples. The panel detected more positive specimens than the methods in use at our hospital. The pre-made panel format was easy to use and rapid, with results available in approximately 90 minutes. We now plan to determine if use of this panel improves patient care and antibiotic stewardship.

Indexed as

Real-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionBacteriaChildHumansMicrobiological TechniquesRespiratory Tract InfectionsRetrospective StudiesVirusesbacterial infectionspediatricpolymerase chain reactionrespiratory infectious diseasesviral infections

Identifiers

PMID26684315
PMCPMC7091212
OpenAlexW2279095806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.