Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26683910›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2015

Prevalence of Hypertension in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ahmed M Sarki, Chidozie U Nduka, Saverio Stranges, Ngianga-Bakwin Kandala, Olalekan A Uthman

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 196 papers, 21 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
196citing papers in PubMed, 21 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

196 citing papers in PubMed, 21 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Life satisfaction and blood pressure: A coordinated analysis of 16 cohorts.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Prevalence of Hypertension in Venezuela: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2026
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

136 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ahmed M SarkiFrom the Division of Health Sciences, University of Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK (AMS, CUN); Family and Youth Health Initiative (FAYOHI), Nigeria (AMS); Department of Population Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Luxembourg (SS, N-BK); Warwick-Centre for Applied Health Research and Delivery (WCAHRD), Division of health Sciences, University of Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK (OAU); and Centre for Applied Health Research and Delivery (CAHRD), Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, International Health Group, Liverpool, UK (OAU); Department of Mathematics and Information sciences, Faculty of Engineering and Environment, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK (N-BK).
Chidozie U Nduka
Saverio Stranges
Ngianga-Bakwin Kandala
Olalekan A Uthman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to obtain overall and regional estimates of hypertension prevalence, and to examine the pattern of this disease condition across different socio-demographic characteristics in low-and middle-income countries. We searched electronic databases from inception to August 2015. We included population-based studies that reported hypertension prevalence using the current definition of blood pressure ≥140/90 mm Hg or self-reported use of antihypertensive medication. We used random-effects meta-analyses to pool prevalence estimates of hypertension, overall, by World Bank region and country income group. Meta-regression analyses were performed to explore sources of heterogeneity across the included studies. A total of 242 studies, comprising data on 1,494,609 adults from 45 countries, met our inclusion criteria. The overall prevalence of hypertension was 32.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 29.4-35.3), with the Latin America and Caribbean region reporting the highest estimates (39.1%, 95% CI 33.1-45.2). Pooled prevalence estimate was also highest across upper middle income countries (37.8%, 95% CI 35.0-40.6) and lowest across low-income countries (23.1%, 95% CI 20.1-26.2). Prevalence estimates were significantly higher in the elderly (≥65 years) compared with younger adults (<65 years) overall and across the geographical regions; however, there was no significant sex-difference in hypertension prevalence (31.9% vs 30.8%, P = 0.6). Persons without formal education (49.0% vs 24.9%, P < 0.00001), overweight/obese (46.4% vs 26.3%, P < 0.00001), and urban settlers (32.7% vs 25.2%, P = 0.0005) were also more likely to be hypertensive, compared with those who were educated, normal weight, and rural settlers respectively. This study provides contemporary and up-to-date estimates that reflect the significant burden of hypertension in low- and middle-income countries, as well as evidence that hypertension remains a major public health issue across the various socio-demographic subgroups. On average, about 1 in 3 adults in the developing world is hypertensive. The findings of this study will be useful for the design of hypertension screening and treatment programmes in low- and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAge DistributionAlcohol DrinkingBody Mass IndexDeveloping CountriesFemaleGross Domestic ProductHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSex DistributionSmoking

Identifiers

PMID26683910
PMCPMC5058882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.