Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26683867›Full record

ArticleAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2016

Unmet Needs at the Time of Emergency Department Discharge.

Margaret Samuels-Kalow, Karin Rhodes, Julie Uspal, Alyssa Reyes Smith, Emily Hardy, Cynthia Mollen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Scoping Review of Emergency Department Discharge Risk Stratification.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Margaret Samuels-KalowThe Division of Emergency Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Karin RhodesDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Julie UspalThe Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Emergency Medicine Residency, Philadelphia, PA.
Alyssa Reyes SmithThe Boston Combined Residency Program for Pediatrics, Boston, MA.
Emily HardyThe Division of Emergency Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Cynthia MollenThe Division of Emergency Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.

Funding

Enabling Medical Research Growth in Emergency MedicineK12HL109009 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KIMMEL, STEPHEN E. · 2011 to 2015
$3.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS K12 HL109009NHLBI NIH HHS K12 HL10900904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEmergency department (ED) discharge requires conveying critical information in a time-limited and distracting setting. Limited health literacy may put patients at risk of incomplete comprehension, but the relationship between discharge communication needs and health literacy has not been well defined. The goal of this study was to characterize the variation in needs and preferences regarding the ED discharge process by health literacy and identify novel ideas for process improvement from parents and patients.

methodsThis was an in-depth qualitative interview study in two EDs using asthma as a model system for health communication. Adult patients and parents of pediatric patients with an asthma exacerbation and planned discharge were enrolled using purposive sampling to balance across literacy groups at each site. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, coded independently by two team members, and analyzed using a modified grounded theory approach. Interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was reached in both literacy groups at each site.

resultsIn-depth interviews were completed with 51 participants: 20 adult patients and 31 pediatric parents. The majority of participants identified barriers related to ED providers, such as use of medical terminology, and systems of care, such as absence of protected time for discharge communication. Patients with limited health literacy, but not those with adequate literacy, identified conflicting information between health care sources as a barrier to successful ED discharge.

conclusionsParticipants across literacy groups and settings identified multiple actionable areas for improvement in the ED discharge process. These included the use of simplified/lay language, increased visual learning and demonstration, and the desire for complete information. Individuals with limited literacy may particularly benefit from increased attention to consistency.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyPatient DischargeAdultAsthmaChildComprehensionEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicLanguageMaleNeeds AssessmentParentsPediatricsQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID26683867
PMCPMC4789090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.