Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26683836›Full record

ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2016

Immunohistochemical Analysis of E-Cadherin, p53 and Inhibin-α Expression in Hydatidiform Mole and Hydropic Abortion.

Onur Erol, Dinç Süren, Birsel Tutuş, Tayfun Toptaş, Ahmet Arda Gökay, Aysel Uysal Derbent, Mustafa Kemal Özel, Cem Sezer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular Basis of Hydatidiform Moles-A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Onur ErolDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey. dronurerol@hotmail.com.
Dinç SürenDepartment of Pathology, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Birsel TutuşDepartment of Pathology, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Tayfun ToptaşDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Ahmet Arda GökayDepartment of Pathology, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Aysel Uysal DerbentDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Mustafa Kemal ÖzelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Cem SezerDepartment of Pathology, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Antalya Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of E-cadherin, p53, and inhibin-α immunostaining in the differential diagnosis of hydropic abortion (HA), partial hydatidiform mole (PHM), and complete hydatidiform mole (CHM). E-cadherin, p53, and inhibin-α protein expression patterns were investigated immunohistochemically using paraffin -embedded tissue sections from histologically diagnosed cases of HA (n = 23), PHM (n = 24), and CHM (n = 23). Expression patterns of these markers were scored semi-quantitatively according to the staining intensity, percentage of positive cells, and immunoreactivity score. Classification of cases was established on histologic criteria and supported by the molecular genotyping. Immunostaining allowed the identification of specific cell types with E-cadherin, p53, and inhibin-α expression in all cases. E-cadherin expression was detected on the cell surface of villous cytotrophoblasts. We observed a marked decline in the expression of E-cadherin from HAs to PHMs to CHMs. The p53-positive reaction was restricted to the nucleus of villous cytotrophoblasts. Significantly increased p53 expression was observed in CHMs, compared with HAs and PHMs. The expression of inhibin-α was localised in the cytoplasm of villous syncytiotrophoblasts, and the expression of this marker was significantly higher in PHMs and CHMs than HAs. In conclusion, immunohistochemical analysis of E-cadherin, p53, and inhibin-α expression could serve as a useful adjunct to conventional methods in the differential diagnosis of HA, PHM, and CHM.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousAdolescentAdultAntigens, CDBiomarkersCadherinsDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansHydatidiform MoleImmunohistochemistryInhibinsMiddle AgedPregnancyTrophoblastsTumor Suppressor Protein p53Antigens, CDBiomarkersCadherinsCDH1 protein, humaninhibin-alpha subunitInhibinsTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53E-cadherinHydatidiform moleInhibin-αp53

Identifiers

PMID26683836
OpenAlexW2277923957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.