Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26683202›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2016

Deep sedation versus general anesthesia in percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve reconstruction using the MitraClip system.

Suzanne de Waha, Joerg Seeburger, Joerg Ender, Steffen Desch, Ingo Eitel, Adrian Reinhardt, Janine Pöss, Georg Fuernau, Thilo Noack, Denis Rouven Merk and 4 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Deep sedation versus general anaesthesia for transcatheter mitral valve repair: an individual patient data meta-analysis of observational studies.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. [Nonoperating room anesthesia].Der Anaesthesist · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Atrioventricular valve disease: challenges and achievements in percutaneous treatment.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Suzanne de WahaDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical Clinic II (Cardiology/Angiology/Intensive Care Medicine), University Heart Center Luebeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany. s-dw@gmx.net.
Joerg SeeburgerDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Joerg EnderDepartment of Anesthesiology, Heart Center, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Steffen DeschDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical Clinic II (Cardiology/Angiology/Intensive Care Medicine), University Heart Center Luebeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Ingo EitelDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical Clinic II (Cardiology/Angiology/Intensive Care Medicine), University Heart Center Luebeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Adrian ReinhardtDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical Clinic II (Cardiology/Angiology/Intensive Care Medicine), University Heart Center Luebeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Janine PössDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical Clinic II (Cardiology/Angiology/Intensive Care Medicine), University Heart Center Luebeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Georg FuernauDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical Clinic II (Cardiology/Angiology/Intensive Care Medicine), University Heart Center Luebeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Thilo NoackDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Denis Rouven MerkDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Gerhard SchulerDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Hans-Hinrich SieversDepartment of Cardiac and Thoracic Vascular Surgery, University Heart Center Luebeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
Friedrich-Wilhelm MohrDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Holger ThieleDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical Clinic II (Cardiology/Angiology/Intensive Care Medicine), University Heart Center Luebeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Leipzig Heart Institute · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DEGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPercutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve reconstruction (PMVR) has emerged as a treatment option in patients with severe mitral regurgitation not considered suitable candidates for surgery. The majority of PMVR procedures are performed under general anesthesia (GA), although deep sedation (DS) appears to be an attractive alternative. We thus sought to assess the impact on intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, efficacy, and safety of DS in comparison to GA in patients undergoing PMVR using the MitraClip(®) system.

methodsSixty consecutive patients underwent PMVR procedures at two centers. The first 30 patients were treated by GA followed by 30 patients undergoing DS under different settings. The primary clinical endpoint was ICU length of stay. The primary efficacy endpoint included procedural success and procedural duration. The safety endpoint was defined as a composite of death, stroke, cardiogenic shock, moderate and severe bleeding as well as pneumonia.

resultsThe ICU length of stay was significantly shorter in the DS group in comparison to GA patients (p = 0.001). The hospital length of stay did not differ following DS in comparison to GA (p = 0.96). Procedural success was high in both groups (100 versus 96.7 %, p = 0.34) at similar procedural duration time (p = 0.60). No difference between GA and DS was observed with respect to the occurrence of the combined safety endpoint (p = 0.47).

conclusionsIn comparison to GA, DS reduces the ICU length of stay in PMVR without negative effects on safety and efficacy. Prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, GeneralDeep SedationAgedAged, 80 and overCardiac CatheterizationEquipment DesignFemaleGermanyHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayMaleMitral Valve InsufficiencyProspective StudiesRegistriesRisk FactorsDeep sedationGeneral anesthesiaMitral regurgitationPercutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID26683202
OpenAlexW2236374000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.