ArticlePLoS computational biology2015
Network-Based Integration of Disparate Omic Data To Identify "Silent Players" in Cancer.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative multi-omics analysisiScience · 2025Article
- Reconciling multiple connectivity-based systems biology methods for drug repurposing.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Bigpicc: a graph-based approach to identifying carcinogenic gene combinations from mutation data.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Enhancing Molecular Network-Based Cancer Driver Gene Prediction Using Machine Learning Approaches: Current Challenges and Opportunities.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Editorial: Multi-scale systems: ecological approaches to investigate the role of the microbiota in different niches.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
- Integration of transcriptional and epigenetic regulation of TFEB reveals its dual functional roles in Pan-cancer.NAR cancer · 2024Article
- Mapping the common gene networks that underlie related diseases.Nature protocols · 2023Review
- Functional characterization of co-phosphorylation networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Decoding disease: from genomes to networks to phenotypes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2021Review
- Network propagation-based prioritization of long tail genes in 17 cancer types.Genome biology · 2021Article
- Multi-omics approaches identifyActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2021Article
- A Novel Biomarker Identification Approach for Gastric Cancer Using Gene Expression and DNA Methylation Dataset.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Integrative Data Analytic Framework to Enhance Cancer Precision Medicine.Network and systems medicine · 2021Article
- Characterizing glycosyltransferases by a combination of sequencing platforms applied to the leaf tissues of Stevia rebaudiana.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- NetCore: a network propagation approach using node coreness.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Prediction of cancer driver genes through network-based moment propagation of mutation scores.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- uKIN Combines New and Prior Information with Guided Network Propagation to Accurately Identify Disease Genes.Cell systems · 2020Article
- Graph- and rule-based learning algorithms: a comprehensive review of their applications for cancer type classification and prognosis using genomic data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2020Review
- Gene relevance based on multiple evidences in complex networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Network Diffusion Promotes the Integrative Analysis of Multiple Omics.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Development of high-throughput monitoring technologies enables interrogation of cancer samples at various levels of cellular activity. Capitalizing on these developments, various public efforts such as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) generate disparate omic data for large patient cohorts. As demonstrated by recent studies, these heterogeneous data sources provide the opportunity to gain insights into the molecular changes that drive cancer pathogenesis and progression. However, these insights are limited by the vast search space and as a result low statistical power to make new discoveries. In this paper, we propose methods for integrating disparate omic data using molecular interaction networks, with a view to gaining mechanistic insights into the relationship between molecular changes at different levels of cellular activity. Namely, we hypothesize that genes that play a role in cancer development and progression may be implicated by neither frequent mutation nor differential expression, and that network-based integration of mutation and differential expression data can reveal these "silent players". For this purpose, we utilize network-propagation algorithms to simulate the information flow in the cell at a sample-specific resolution. We then use the propagated mutation and expression signals to identify genes that are not necessarily mutated or differentially expressed genes, but have an essential role in tumor development and patient outcome. We test the proposed method on breast cancer and glioblastoma multiforme data obtained from TCGA. Our results show that the proposed method can identify important proteins that are not readily revealed by molecular data, providing insights beyond what can be gleaned by analyzing different types of molecular data in isolation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.