Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26683070›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2016

Quantifying the spatial extent of the corollary discharge benefit to transsaccadic visual perception.

Laurence C Jayet Bray, Sonia Bansal, Wilsaan M Joiner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Variations in crowding, saccadic precision, and spatial localization reveal the shared topology of spatial vision.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  6. Circuits for presaccadic visual remapping.Journal of neurophysiology · 2016
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laurence C Jayet BrayDepartment of Bioengineering, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia;
Sonia BansalDepartment of Neuroscience, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia; and.
Wilsaan M JoinerDepartment of Bioengineering, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia; Department of Neuroscience, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia; and Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study, Sensorimotor Integration Laboratory, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia wjoiner2@gmu.edu.

Funding

ROLE OF THE SACCADIC EYE-MOVEMENT COROLLARY DISCHARGE IN STABLE VISUAL PERCEPTIONR00EY021252 · NEI · GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY · PI JOINER, WILSAAN M · 2012 to 2014
$715k
NEI NIH HHS R00 EY-021252NEI NIH HHS R00 EY021252
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extraretinal information, such as corollary discharge (CD), is hypothesized to help compensate for saccade-induced visual input disruptions. However, support for this hypothesis is largely for one-dimensional transsaccadic visual changes, with little comprehensive information on the spatial characteristics. Here we systematically mapped the two-dimensional extent of this compensation by quantifying the insensitivity to different displacement metrics. Human subjects made saccades to targets positioned at different amplitudes (4° or 8°) and directions (rightward, oblique, or upward). After the saccade the initial target disappeared and, after a blank period, reappeared at a shifted location-a collinear, diagonal, or orthogonal displacement. Subjects reported the perceived shift direction, and we determined the displacement detection based on the perceptual judgments. The two-dimensional insensitivity fields resulting from the perceptual thresholds had spatial features similar to the saccadic eye movement variability: 1) scaled with movement amplitude, 2) oriented (less sensitive to the change) along the saccade vector, and 3) approximately constant in shape when normalized by movement amplitude. In addition, comparing the postsaccadic perceptual estimate of the presaccadic target location to that based solely on the postsaccade visual error showed that overall the perceptual estimate was approximately 50% more accurate and 35% less variable than estimates based solely on this visual information. However, this relationship was not uniform: The benefit of extraretinal information was observed largely for displacements with a component parallel to the saccade vector. These results suggest a graded use of extraretinal information when forming the postsaccadic perceptual evaluation of transsaccadic environmental changes.

Indexed as

SaccadesVisual PerceptionAdolescentFemaleHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceYoung Adultcorollary dischargemovement variabilitysaccadevisual errorvisual perception

Identifiers

PMID26683070
PMCPMC4808092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.