Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26682861›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2015

Coexistence of Microaerophilic, Nitrate-Reducing, and Phototrophic Fe(II) Oxidizers and Fe(III) Reducers in Coastal Marine Sediment.

Katja Laufer, Mark Nordhoff, Hans Røy, Caroline Schmidt, Sebastian Behrens, Bo Barker Jørgensen, Andreas Kappler

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Isolation of 'International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Meta-omics RevealApplied and environmental microbiology · 2021
    Article
  14. An evolving view on biogeochemical cycling of iron.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Genomic Insights into Two Novel Fe(II)-OxidizingApplied and environmental microbiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katja LauferGeomicrobiology, Center for Applied Geosciences, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Mark NordhoffGeomicrobiology, Center for Applied Geosciences, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Hans RøyCenter for Geomicrobiology, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Caroline SchmidtGeomicrobiology, Center for Applied Geosciences, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Sebastian BehrensGeomicrobiology, Center for Applied Geosciences, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Bo Barker JørgensenCenter for Geomicrobiology, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Andreas KapplerGeomicrobiology, Center for Applied Geosciences, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany andreas.kappler@uni-tuebingen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Iron is abundant in sediments, where it can be biogeochemically cycled between its divalent and trivalent redox states. The neutrophilic microbiological Fe cycle involves Fe(III)-reducing and three different physiological groups of Fe(II)-oxidizing microorganisms, i.e., microaerophilic, anoxygenic phototrophic, and nitrate-reducing Fe(II) oxidizers. However, it is unknown whether all three groups coexist in one habitat and how they are spatially distributed in relation to gradients of O2, light, nitrate, and Fe(II). We examined two coastal marine sediments in Aarhus Bay, Denmark, by cultivation and most probable number (MPN) studies for Fe(II) oxidizers and Fe(III) reducers and by quantitative-PCR (qPCR) assays for microaerophilic Fe(II) oxidizers. Our results demonstrate the coexistence of all three metabolic types of Fe(II) oxidizers and Fe(III) reducers. In qPCR, microaerophilic Fe(II) oxidizers (Zetaproteobacteria) were present with up to 3.2 × 10(6) cells g dry sediment(-1). In MPNs, nitrate-reducing Fe(II) oxidizers, anoxygenic phototrophic Fe(II) oxidizers, and Fe(III) reducers reached cell numbers of up to 3.5 × 10(4), 3.1 × 10(2), and 4.4 × 10(4) g dry sediment(-1), respectively. O2 and light penetrated only a few millimeters, but the depth distribution of the different iron metabolizers did not correlate with the profile of O2, Fe(II), or light. Instead, abundances were homogeneous within the upper 3 cm of the sediment, probably due to wave-induced sediment reworking and bioturbation. In microaerophilic Fe(II)-oxidizing enrichment cultures, strains belonging to the Zetaproteobacteria were identified. Photoferrotrophic enrichments contained strains related to Chlorobium and Rhodobacter; the nitrate-reducing Fe(II) enrichments contained strains related to Hoeflea and Denitromonas. This study shows the coexistence of all three types of Fe(II) oxidizers in two near-shore marine environments and the potential for competition and interrelationships between them.

Indexed as

BiotaPhototrophic ProcessesAerobiosisBacteriaDenmarkFerric CompoundsFerrous CompoundsGeologic SedimentsNitratesOxidation-ReductionReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionFerric CompoundsFerrous CompoundsNitrates

Identifiers

PMID26682861
PMCPMC4771319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.