Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26682856›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2016

pyrF as a Counterselectable Marker for Unmarked Genetic Manipulations in Treponema denticola.

Kurni Kurniyati, Chunhao Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genetic tools for the electrotrophApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Development of aJournal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2021
    Article
  10. Genetic Manipulations of Oral Spirochete Treponema denticola.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kurni KurniyatiDepartment of Oral Biology, The State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USAMcMaster University.
Chunhao LiDepartment of Oral Biology, The State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USAMcMaster University cli9@buffalo.edu.

Funding

Exploring New Virulence Factors of the Oral Spirochete Treponema denticolaR01DE023080 · NIDCR · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI Chunhao Chris Li · 2013 to 2026
$5.2M
NIDCR NIH HHS DE023080NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE023080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pathophysiology of Treponema denticola, an oral pathogen associated with both periodontal and endodontic infections, is poorly understood due to its fastidious growth and recalcitrance to genetic manipulations. Counterselectable markers are instrumental in constructing clean and unmarked mutations in bacteria. Here, we demonstrate that pyrF, a gene encoding orotidine-5'-monophosphate decarboxylase, can be used as a counterselectable marker in T. denticola to construct marker-free mutants. T. denticola is susceptible to 5-fluoroorotic acid (5-FOA). To establish a pyrF-based counterselectable knockout system in T. denticola, the pyrF gene was deleted. The deletion conferred resistance to 5-FOA in T. denticola. Next, a single-crossover mutant was constructed by reintroducing pyrF along with a gentamicin resistance gene (aacC1) back into the chromosome of the pyrF mutant at the locus of choice. In this study, we chose flgE, a flagellar hook gene that is located within a large polycistronic motility gene operon, as our target gene. The obtained single-crossover mutant (named FlgE(in)) regained the susceptibility to 5-FOA. Finally, FlgE(in) was plated on solid agar containing 5-FOA. Numerous colonies of the 5-FOA-resistant mutant (named FlgE(out)) were obtained and characterized by PCR and Southern blotting analyses. The results showed that the flgE gene was deleted and FlgE(out) was free of selection markers (i.e., pyrF and aacC1). Compared to previously constructed flgE mutants that contain an antibiotic selection marker, the deletion of flgE in FlgE(out) has no polar effect on its downstream gene expression. The system developed here will provide us with a new tool for investigating the genetics and pathogenicity of T. denticola.

Indexed as

Selection, GeneticDrug Resistance, BacterialGene Knockout TechniquesGenetics, MicrobialOrotic AcidOrotidine-5'-Phosphate DecarboxylaseTreponema denticola5-fluoroorotic acidOrotic AcidOrotidine-5'-Phosphate Decarboxylase

Identifiers

PMID26682856
PMCPMC4751821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.