Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26682804›Full record

ReviewBiophysical journal2015

In-Cell Solid-State NMR: An Emerging Technique for the Study of Biological Membranes.

Xavier L Warnet, Alexandre A Arnold, Isabelle Marcotte, Dror E Warschawski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Advances in studying protein disorder with solid-state NMR.Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance · 2020
    Review
  12. De novo resonance assignment of the transmembrane domain of LR11/SorLA in E. coli membranes.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Applications of In-Cell NMR in Structural Biology and Drug Discovery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. New applications of solid-state NMR in structural biology.Emerging topics in life sciences · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xavier L WarnetUMR 7099, CNRS-Université Paris Diderot, Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, Paris, France.
Alexandre A ArnoldDepartment of Chemistry, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Isabelle MarcotteDepartment of Chemistry, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Dror E WarschawskiUMR 7099, CNRS-Université Paris Diderot, Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, Paris, France. Electronic address: dror.warschawski@ibpc.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological molecular processes are often studied in model systems, which simplifies their inherent complexity but may cause investigators to lose sight of the effects of the molecular environment. Information obtained in this way must therefore be validated by experiments in the cell. NMR has been used to study biological cells since the early days of its development. The first NMR structural studies of a protein inside a cell (by solution-state NMR) and of a membrane protein (by solid-state NMR) were published in 2001 and 2011, respectively. More recently, dynamic nuclear polarization, which has been used to enhance the signal in solid-state NMR, has also been applied to the study of frozen cells. Much progress has been made in the past 5 years, and in this review we take stock of this new technique, which is particularly appropriate for the study of biological membranes.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell MembraneCell WallExtracellular MatrixHumansLipidsMembrane ProteinsNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularLipidsMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26682804
PMCPMC4699878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.