ArticleJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2016
Multiparameter evaluation of in vivo gene delivery using ultrasound-guided, microbubble-enhanced sonoporation.
Article in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.
- In vivo expression of CD3/CD19 bispecific T-cell engager and α-PD-L1-Fc enables effective and durable immunotherapy for CD19Leukemia · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-mediated targeted micro/nanobubbles: breaking new boundaries in precision tumor therapy.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Efficacy of Plasmid DNA Delivery into Mice by Intradermal Injections Alone and Facilitated by Sonoporation or Electroporation.Vaccines · 2026Article
- In vivo placental gene modulation via sonoporation.Placenta · 2025Article
- PDGFR-α shRNA-polyplex for uveal melanoma treatment via EMT mediated vasculogenic mimicry interfering.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Article
- Remote-Controlled Gene Delivery in Coaxial 3D-Bioprinted Constructs using Ultrasound-Responsive Bioinks.Cellular and molecular bioengineering · 2024Article
- [Utilizing Sonodynamic Therapy-Induced Pyroptosis for Liver Cancer Therapy].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2024Review
- Miniaturized therapeutic systems for ultrasound-modulated drug delivery to the central and peripheral nervous system.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2024Review
- Physicochemical Stimulus-Responsive Systems Targeted with Antibody Derivatives.Current molecular medicine · 2024Review
- Acoustomechanically activatable liposomes for ultrasonic drug uncaging.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Exosomes as an Emerging Plasmid Delivery Vehicle for Gene Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- "Genetic scissors" CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing cutting-edge biocarrier technology for bone and cartilage repair.Bioactive materials · 2023Review
- Target tumor therapy in human gastric cancer cells through the combination of docetaxel-loaded cationic lipid microbubbles and ultrasound-triggered microbubble destruction.Functional & integrative genomics · 2023Article
- Optimal treatment occasion for ultrasound stimulated microbubbles in promoting gemcitabine delivery to VX2 tumors.Drug delivery · 2022Article
- Plug and Pop: A 3D-Printed, Modular Platform for Drug Delivery Using Clinical Ultrasound and Microbubbles.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- The Progress of Non-Viral Materials and Methods for Gene Delivery to Skeletal Muscle.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Applications of Ultrasound-Mediated Gene Delivery in Regenerative Medicine.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Stable flow-induced expression of KLK10 inhibits endothelial inflammation and atherosclerosis.eLife · 2022Article
- Ultrasound-Targeted Microbubble Destruction: Modulation in the Tumor Microenvironment and Application in Tumor Immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- UTMD promoted local delivery of miR-34a-mimic for ovarian cancer therapy.Drug delivery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
More than 1800 gene therapy clinical trials worldwide have targeted a wide range of conditions including cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and monogenic diseases. Biological (i.e. viral), chemical, and physical approaches have been developed to deliver nucleic acids into cells. Although viral vectors offer the greatest efficiency, they also raise major safety concerns including carcinogenesis and immunogenicity. The goal of microbubble-mediated sonoporation is to enhance the uptake of drugs and nucleic acids. Insonation of microbubbles is thought to facilitate two mechanisms for enhanced uptake: first, deflection of the cell membrane inducing endocytotic uptake, and second, microbubble jetting inducing the formation of pores in the cell membrane. We hypothesized that ultrasound could be used to guide local microbubble-enhanced sonoporation of plasmid DNA. With the aim of optimizing delivery efficiency, we used nonlinear ultrasound and bioluminescence imaging to optimize the acoustic pressure, microbubble concentration, treatment duration, DNA dosage, and number of treatments required for in vivo Luciferase gene expression in a mouse thigh muscle model. We found that mice injected with 50μg luciferase plasmid DNA and 5×10(5) microbubbles followed by ultrasound treatment at 1.4MHz, 200kPa, 100-cycle pulse length, and 540 Hz pulse repetition frequency (PRF) for 2min exhibited superior transgene expression compared to all other treatment groups. The bioluminescent signal measured for these mice on Day 4 post-treatment was 100-fold higher (p<0.0001, n=5 or 6) than the signals for controls treated with DNA injection alone, DNA and microbubble injection, or DNA injection and ultrasound treatment. Our results indicate that these conditions result in efficient gene delivery and prolonged gene expression (up to 21days) with no evidence of tissue damage or off-target delivery. We believe that these promising results bear great promise for the development of microbubble-enhanced sonoporation-induced gene therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.