ArticleAIMS neuroscience2015
An alternative to domain-general or domain-specific frameworks for theorizing about human evolution and ontogenesis.
Article in AIMS neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Child first language and adult second language are both tied to general-purpose learning systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Functional Brain Imaging Studies in Neurofibromatosis 1.Neuropsychology review · 2026Review
- Humans have a longer period of cortical maturation across depth and hierarchy than macaques.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Myelination across cortical hierarchies and depths in humans and macaques.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Expansion of a conserved architecture drives the evolution of the primate visual cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Virtual reality programs targeting executive functions and social cognition evaluation and/or rehabilitation in children with ADHD or ASD-A narrative review.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Review
- Functional dissociation of the language network and other cognition in early childhood.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- The Domain-Specific Neural Basis of Auditory Statistical Learning in 5-7-Year-Old Children.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Phonological and Semantic Specialization in 9- to 10-Year-Old Children During Auditory Word Processing.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023Article
- Neural specialization to human faces at the age of 7 months.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- To What Extent Is General Intelligence Relevant to Causal Reasoning? A Developmental Study.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Rhythm and timing as vulnerabilities in neurodevelopmental disorders.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021Review
- Cooperative care and the evolution of the prelinguistic vocal learning.Developmental psychobiology · 2021Article
- What Impacts Early Language Skills? Effects of Social Disparities and Different Process Characteristics of the Home Learning Environment in the First 2 Years.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Neurodevelopmental Disorders Affecting Sociability: Recent Research Advances and Future Directions in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Williams Syndrome.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2018Review
- Language-related domain-specific and domain-general systems in the human brain.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2018Review
- Efficacy of early interventions for infants and young children with, and at risk for, autism spectrum disorders.International review of psychiatry (Abingdon, England) · 2018Review
- Reviving pragmatic theory of theory of mind.AIMS neuroscience · 2018Review
- Symbiosis, Parasitism and Bilingual Cognitive Control: A Neuroemergentist Perspective.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
This paper maintains that neither a domain-general nor a domain-specific framework is appropriate for furthering our understanding of human evolution and ontogenesis. Rather, as we learn increasingly more about the dynamics of gene-environment interaction and gene expression, theorists should consider a third alternative: a domain-relevant approach, which argues that the infant brain comes equipped with biases that are relevant to, but not initially specific to, processing different kinds of input. The hypothesis developed here is that domain-specific core knowledge/specialized functions do not constitute the start state; rather, functional specialization emerges progressively through neuronal competition over developmental time. Thus, the existence of category-specific deficits in brain-damaged adults cannot be used to bolster claims that category-specific or domain-specific modules underpin early development, because neural specificity in the adult brain is likely to have been the emergent property over time of a developing, self-structuring system in interaction with the environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.