Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26682143›Full record

ReviewQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2015

Diffusion-weighted imaging in musculoskeletal radiology-clinical applications and future directions.

Nicholas Bhojwani, Peter Szpakowski, Sasan Partovi, Martin H Maurer, Ulrich Grosse, Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk, Lisa Zipp-Partovi, Nathan Fergus, Christos Kosmas, Konstantin Nikolaou and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Bone tumors: state-of-the-art imaging.Skeletal radiology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Applications of Diffusion-Weighted MRI to the Musculoskeletal System.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Correcting BScientific reports · 2022
    Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. New Techniques in MR Imaging of the Ankle and Foot.Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America · 2017
    Review
  20. Quantitative imaging methods in osteoporosis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nicholas Bhojwani1 Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; 2 Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA ; 3 Institute of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Freiburgstrasse, Bern 3010, Switzerland ; 4 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany ; 5 Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Peter Szpakowski1 Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; 2 Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA ; 3 Institute of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Freiburgstrasse, Bern 3010, Switzerland ; 4 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany ; 5 Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Sasan Partovi1 Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; 2 Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA ; 3 Institute of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Freiburgstrasse, Bern 3010, Switzerland ; 4 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany ; 5 Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Martin H Maurer1 Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; 2 Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA ; 3 Institute of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Freiburgstrasse, Bern 3010, Switzerland ; 4 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany ; 5 Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Ulrich Grosse1 Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; 2 Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA ; 3 Institute of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Freiburgstrasse, Bern 3010, Switzerland ; 4 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany ; 5 Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk1 Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; 2 Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA ; 3 Institute of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Freiburgstrasse, Bern 3010, Switzerland ; 4 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany ; 5 Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Lisa Zipp-Partovi1 Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; 2 Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA ; 3 Institute of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Freiburgstrasse, Bern 3010, Switzerland ; 4 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany ; 5 Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Nathan Fergus1 Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; 2 Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA ; 3 Institute of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Freiburgstrasse, Bern 3010, Switzerland ; 4 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany ; 5 Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Christos Kosmas1 Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; 2 Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA ; 3 Institute of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Freiburgstrasse, Bern 3010, Switzerland ; 4 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany ; 5 Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Konstantin Nikolaou1 Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; 2 Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA ; 3 Institute of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Freiburgstrasse, Bern 3010, Switzerland ; 4 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany ; 5 Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Mark R Robbin1 Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; 2 Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA ; 3 Institute of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Freiburgstrasse, Bern 3010, Switzerland ; 4 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany ; 5 Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is an established diagnostic tool with regards to the central nervous system (CNS) and research into its application in the musculoskeletal system has been growing. It has been shown that DWI has utility in differentiating vertebral compression fractures from malignant ones, assessing partial and complete tears of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), monitoring tumor response to therapy, and characterization of soft-tissue and bone tumors. DWI is however less useful in differentiating malignant vs. infectious processes. As of yet, no definitive qualitative or quantitative properties have been established due to reasons ranging from variability in acquisition protocols to overlapping imaging characteristics. Even with these limitations, DWI can still provide clinically useful information, increasing diagnostic accuracy and improving patient management when magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings are inconclusive. The purpose of this article is to summarize recent research into DWI applications in the musculoskeletal system.

Indexed as

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)inflammatory conditionsmagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)musculoskeletal neoplasmsPET/MRItherapy assessment

Identifiers

PMID26682143
PMCPMC4671978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.