Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26682072›Full record

ArticleNeural plasticity2015

Distinct Functions of Endophilin Isoforms in Synaptic Vesicle Endocytosis.

Jifeng Zhang, Minghui Tan, Yichen Yin, Bingyu Ren, Nannan Jiang, Guoqing Guo, Yuan Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural plasticity, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Holistic Investigation of Graphene Quantum Dot Endocytosis.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Synaptotagmin-11 Inhibits Synaptic Vesicle Endocytosis via Endophilin A1.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Synaptic Vesicle Endocytosis in Different Model Systems.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jifeng ZhangDepartment of Anatomy, Medical College of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510630, China ; Center for Neurobiology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Minghui TanDepartment of Anatomy, Medical College of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510630, China ; Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510630, China.
Yichen YinDepartment of Neurology, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510220, China.
Bingyu RenCenter for Neurobiology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Nannan JiangCenter for Neurobiology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Guoqing GuoDepartment of Anatomy, Medical College of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510630, China.
Yuan ChenCenter for Neurobiology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Jinan University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endophilin isoforms perform distinct characteristics in their interactions with N-type Ca(2+) channels and dynamin. However, precise functional differences for the endophilin isoforms on synaptic vesicle (SV) endocytosis remain unknown. By coupling RNA interference and electrophysiological recording techniques in cultured rat hippocampal neurons, we investigated the functional differences of three isoforms of endophilin in SV endocytosis. The results showed that the amplitude of normalized evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents in endophilin1 knockdown neurons decreased significantly for both single train and multiple train stimulations. Similar results were found using endophilin2 knockdown neurons, whereas endophilin3 siRNA exhibited no change compared with control neurons. Endophilin1 and endophilin2 affected SV endocytosis, but the effect of endophilin1 and endophilin2 double knockdown was not different from that of either knockdown alone. This result suggested that endophilin1 and endophilin2 functioned together but not independently during SV endocytosis. Taken together, our results indicate that SV endocytosis is sustained by endophilin1 and endophilin2 isoforms, but not by endophilin3, in primary cultured hippocampal neurons.

Indexed as

EndocytosisAcyltransferasesAnimalsCells, CulturedExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsHEK293 CellsHippocampusHumansNerve Tissue ProteinsNeuronsProtein IsoformsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySynaptic Vesicles2-acylglycerophosphate acyltransferaseAcyltransferasesendophilin 3, ratNerve Tissue ProteinsProtein Isoforms

Identifiers

PMID26682072
PMCPMC4670672
OpenAlexW1561126472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.