Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26681914›Full record

ArticleSeparation and purification technology2015

Fractionation of a galacto-oligosaccharides solution at low and high temperature using nanofiltration.

Suwattana Pruksasri, Thu-Ha Nguyen, Dietmar Haltrich, Senad Novalin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Separation and purification technology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Trends in lactose-derived bioactives: synthesis and purification.Systems microbiology and biomanufacturing · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Nanofiltration for separation and purification of saccharides from biomass.Frontiers of chemical science and engineering · 2021
    Review
  8. Synthesis and purification of galacto-oligosaccharides: state of the art.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Suwattana PruksasriDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Engineering and Industrial Technology, Silpakorn University, Nakhon Pathom 73000, Thailand.
Thu-Ha NguyenInstitute of Food Technology, BOKU University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Dietmar HaltrichInstitute of Food Technology, BOKU University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Senad NovalinInstitute of Food Technology, BOKU University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 24868
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Like in many applications, solutions of high sugar content can cause serious problems due to microorganism contaminations. Hence, the main aim of this work was to study a nanofiltration process for GOS purification at 5 °C and 60 °C that may circumvent or reduce potential microbial growth. Process performances and rejection behaviors of monosaccharide as well as individual GOS components were compared. Operating at 5 °C is more advantageous especially with respect to the oligosaccharide (OS) recovery yield. Using a NF membrane (NP030) at 45 bar, a product purity of 85% (based on monosaccharide content) and an OS recovery yield of 82% could be achieved. However, a low average permeate flux of 3 L/m

Indexed as

Galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS)NanofiltrationPore radius distributionRejectionSelectivity

Identifiers

PMID26681914
PMCPMC4678604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.