ArticleP & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management2015
Practice Guideline Development, Grading, and Assessment.
Article in P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Increasing the environmental sustainability of operating rooms in Canada: an evidence-informed guideline for policy.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026Guideline
- Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the management of acute ankle injuries according to: a PRISMA systematic review and quality appraisal with AGREE II.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Pooled it
- Consensus guidelines for sarcopenia prevention, diagnosis and management in Australia and New Zealand.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Physical Frailty: ICFSR International Clinical Practice Guidelines for Identification and Management.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2019Guideline
- Developing a strategy for identifying recommendations prioritized for implementation in the Colombian health system.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
- Article
- Philippine guidelines on the dietary primary prevention of allergic diseases in children.Asia Pacific allergy · 2024Review
- Consensus methods in patellofemoral pain: how rigorous are they? A scoping review.British journal of sports medicine · 2024Article
- Effects of different interventions on bruxism: an overview of systematic reviews.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2024Review
- Evaluation of the reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines on gliomas using the RIGHT checklist.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- International Clinical Practice Guidelines for Sarcopenia (ICFSR): Screening, Diagnosis and Management.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Published clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are abundant and more easily accessible than ever because of advances in technology and communication and the widespread use of electronic medical literature. To make educated therapy recommendations based on published guidelines, it is important for clinicians to understand the process of guideline development and to be familiar with the resources used to assess guidelines. To do this, clinicians must know the commonly used systems for grading guideline recommendations and for evaluating guideline quality. By increasing their understanding of guideline development, grading, and evaluation processes, clinicians can appropriately use guidelines and provide the highest level of patient care.
Identifiers
26681908PMC4671471What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.