Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26681755›Full record

ReviewArteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology2016

Assessment of Venous Thrombosis in Animal Models.

Steven P Grover, Colin E Evans, Ashish S Patel, Bijan Modarai, Prakash Saha, Alberto Smith

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Antithrombotic Therapy on Antithrombin Resistance in a Mouse Model.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Transforming Growth Factors in Venous Thrombus Formation and Resolution.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Diffusion weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for discriminating acute from non-acute deep venous Thrombus.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steven P GroverFrom the Cardiovascular Division, Academic Department of Vascular Surgery, Kings College London, BHF Centre of Research Excellence and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Kings Health Partners, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Colin E EvansFrom the Cardiovascular Division, Academic Department of Vascular Surgery, Kings College London, BHF Centre of Research Excellence and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Kings Health Partners, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Ashish S PatelFrom the Cardiovascular Division, Academic Department of Vascular Surgery, Kings College London, BHF Centre of Research Excellence and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Kings Health Partners, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Bijan ModaraiFrom the Cardiovascular Division, Academic Department of Vascular Surgery, Kings College London, BHF Centre of Research Excellence and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Kings Health Partners, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Prakash SahaFrom the Cardiovascular Division, Academic Department of Vascular Surgery, Kings College London, BHF Centre of Research Excellence and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Kings Health Partners, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom. prakash.2.saha@kcl.ac.uk.
Alberto SmithFrom the Cardiovascular Division, Academic Department of Vascular Surgery, Kings College London, BHF Centre of Research Excellence and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Kings Health Partners, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Kings Health Partners · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/11/37/28819Wellcome Trust 090252
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep vein thrombosis and common complications, including pulmonary embolism and post-thrombotic syndrome, represent a major source of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Experimental models of venous thrombosis have provided considerable insight into the cellular and molecular mechanisms that regulate thrombus formation and subsequent resolution. Here, we critically appraise the ex vivo and in vivo techniques used to assess venous thrombosis in these models. Particular attention is paid to imaging modalities, including magnetic resonance imaging, micro-computed tomography, and high-frequency ultrasound that facilitate longitudinal assessment of thrombus size and composition.

Indexed as

VeinsAnimalsBiomarkersBlood Flow VelocityDiagnostic ImagingPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRegional Blood FlowVenous ThrombosisBiomarkershistological techniquesmodels, animalmolecular imagingvenous thrombosis

Identifiers

PMID26681755
PMCPMC4805178
OpenAlexW2219000410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.