Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26681680›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2016

A randomized phase II study of S-1 plus oral leucovorin versus S-1 monotherapy in patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer.

M Ueno, T Okusaka, Y Omuro, H Isayama, A Fukutomi, M Ikeda, N Mizuno, K Fukuzawa, M Furukawa, H Iguchi and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04923529 (Phase II Trial of TAS-102 in Patients With Advanced, Refractory Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04923529 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Phase II Trial of TAS-102 in Patients With Advanced, Refractory Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2021 to 2024Enrolled28ConditionsPancreas CancerArmsTAS 102
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. An update on treatment options for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

M UenoDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama uenom@kcch.jp.
T OkusakaDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo.
Y OmuroDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo.
H IsayamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, The University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo.
A FukutomiDivision of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka.
M IkedaDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa.
N MizunoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya.
K FukuzawaDepartment of Surgery, Oita Red Cross Hospital, Oita.
M FurukawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka.
H IguchiDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama.
K SugimoriGastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama.
J FuruseDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo.
K ShimadaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama.
T IokaDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka.
S NakamoriHepato-biliary-pancreatic Surgery, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka.
H BabaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto.
Y KomatsuDepartment of Cancer Chemotherapy, Hokkaido University Hospital Cancer Center, Sapporo.
M TakeuchiDepartment of Clinical Medicine (Biostatistics and Pharmaceutical Medicine), Kitasato University School of Pharmacy, Tokyo.
I HyodoDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba.
N BokuDepartment of Clinical Oncology, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of adding oral leucovorin (LV) to S-1 when compared with S-1 monotherapy in patients with gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer (PC). PATIENTS AND

methodsGemcitabine-refractory PC patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive S-1 at 40, 50, or 60 mg according to body surface area plus LV 25 mg, both given orally twice daily for 1 week, repeated every 2 weeks (SL group), or S-1 monotherapy at the same dose as the SL group for 4 weeks, repeated every 6 weeks (S-1 group). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).

resultsAmong 142 patients enrolled, 140 were eligible for efficacy assessment (SL: n = 69 and S-1: n = 71). PFS was significantly longer in the SL group than in the S-1 group [median PFS, 3.8 versus 2.7 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.56; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37-0.85; P = 0.003]). The disease control rate was significantly higher in the SL group than in the S-1 group (91% versus 72%; P = 0.004). Overall survival (OS) was similar in both groups (median OS, 6.3 versus 6.1 months; HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.54-1.22; P = 0.463). After adjusting for patient background factors in a multivariate analysis, OS tended to be better in the SL group (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.47-1.07; P = 0.099). Both treatments were well tolerated, although gastrointestinal toxicities were slightly more severe in the SL group.

conclusionThe addition of LV to S-1 significantly improved PFS in patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced PC, and a phase III trial has been initiated in a similar setting. CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER: Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center: JapicCTI-111554.

Indexed as

AgedAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDeoxycytidineDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionDrug CombinationsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleGemcitabineHumansJapanLeucovorinMaleMiddle AgedOxonic AcidAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticDeoxycytidineDrug CombinationsGemcitabineLeucovorinOxonic AcidS 1 (combination)Tegafuralbumingemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancerleucovorinpancreatic resectionphase II studyS-1

Identifiers

PMID26681680
PMCPMC4769993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.