Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26681675›Full record

ArticleAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2016

Methanol-based fixation is superior to buffered formalin for next-generation sequencing of DNA from clinical cancer samples.

A M Piskorz, D Ennis, G Macintyre, T E Goranova, M Eldridge, N Segui-Gracia, M Valganon, A Hoyle, C Orange, L Moore and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. ISUOG/ESGO Consensus Statement on ultrasound-guided biopsy in gynecological oncology.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Genomic Landscape of Early-Stage Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

A M PiskorzCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
D EnnisInstitute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow.
G MacintyreCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
T E GoranovaCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
M EldridgeCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
N Segui-GraciaCancer Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
M ValganonCancer Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
A HoyleDepartment of Pathology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow.
C OrangeInstitute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow.
L MooreAddenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge Department of Histopathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
M Jimenez-LinanAddenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge Department of Histopathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
D MillanDepartment of Pathology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow.
I A McNeishInstitute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow iain.mcneish@glasgow.ac.uk.
J D BrentonCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge.
University of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBCancer Research UK · GBQueen Elizabeth University Hospital · GBAddenbrooke's Hospital · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GBNIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15601Cancer Research UK 15973Cancer Research UK A15601Cancer Research UK A15973Cancer Research UK A18072Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNext-generation sequencing (NGS) of tumour samples is a critical component of personalised cancer treatment, but it requires high-quality DNA samples. Routine neutral-buffered formalin (NBF) fixation has detrimental effects on nucleic acids, causing low yields, as well as fragmentation and DNA base changes, leading to significant artefacts. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe have carried out a detailed comparison of DNA quality from matched samples isolated from high-grade serous ovarian cancers from 16 patients fixed in methanol and NBF. These experiments use tumour fragments and mock biopsies to simulate routine practice, ensuring that results are applicable to standard clinical biopsies.

resultsUsing matched snap-frozen tissue as gold standard comparator, we show that methanol-based fixation has significant benefits over NBF, with greater DNA yield, longer fragment size and more accurate copy-number calling using shallow whole-genome sequencing (WGS). These data also provide a new approach to understand and quantify artefactual effects of fixation using non-negative matrix factorisation to analyse mutational spectra from targeted and WGS data.

conclusionWe strongly recommend the adoption of methanol fixation for sample collection strategies in new clinical trials. This approach is immediately available, is logistically simple and can offer cheaper and more reliable mutation calling than traditional NBF fixation.

Indexed as

Base SequenceDNAFormaldehydeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMethanolMiddle AgedNeoplasmsParaffin EmbeddingSequence Analysis, DNATissue FixationDNAFormaldehydeMethanolcopy-number abnormalitiesfixationHGSOCNBFnext-generation sequencingSNVsUMFIX

Identifiers

PMID26681675
PMCPMC4769995
OpenAlexW2205086967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.