Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26681619›Full record

ReviewPsychophysiology2016

Neurocognitive development in socioeconomic context: Multiple mechanisms and implications for measuring socioeconomic status.

Alexandra Ursache, Kimberly G Noble

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychophysiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Socioeconomic status, prefrontal cortical volume, and cardiometabolic risk in early adolescence.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2025
    Article
  13. NIH Baby Toolbox® methodology and norms development.Infant behavior & development · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexandra UrsacheGertrude H. Sergievsky Center, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Kimberly G NobleTeachers College, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

NEUROEPIDEMIOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32NS007153 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI GU, YIAN, WILLEY, JOSHUA ZEBADIAH · 1987 to 2023
$6.2M
NICHD NIH HHS L40 HD077610NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS007153NINDS NIH HHS T32-NS07153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Socioeconomic status (SES) has been linked to functioning across a variety of neurocognitive domains including language, memory, executive functioning, and social-emotional processing. We review these findings and discuss the ways in which socioeconomic context may shape neural processes such that these skills are supported by different neurobiological pathways in children from lower versus higher SES backgrounds. Moreover, we consider the mechanisms by which SES may be related to specific neurocognitive functions. Specifically, we focus on linguistic exposure and stress as two main pathways through which SES could influence neurocognitive processes and shape relations between the neural and behavioral levels of functioning. Finally, suggestions for conceptualizing and measuring SES in future work are offered.

Indexed as

LanguageSocial ClassSocial PerceptionChildChild DevelopmentEmotionsExecutive FunctionHumansMemoryStress, PsychologicalBrain developmentLanguageNeurocognitive functionSocioeconomic statusStress

Identifiers

PMID26681619
PMCPMC4685721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.