Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26680455›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2015

Metagenome from a Spirulina digesting biogas reactor: analysis via binning of contigs and classification of short reads.

Vimac Nolla-Ardèvol, Miriam Peces, Marc Strous, Halina E Tegetmeyer

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Vimac Nolla-ArdèvolInstitute for Genome Research and Systems Biology, Center for Biotechnology, Office G2-152, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstraße 27, Bielefeld, D-33615, Germany. vimacnolla@gmail.com.
Miriam PecesDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Barcelona, C/ Martí i Franquès, 1, 6th floor, Barcelona, 08028, Spain. m.peces@uq.edu.au.
Marc StrousInstitute for Genome Research and Systems Biology, Center for Biotechnology, Office G2-152, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstraße 27, Bielefeld, D-33615, Germany. mstrous@ucalgary.ca.
Halina E TegetmeyerInstitute for Genome Research and Systems Biology, Center for Biotechnology, Office G2-152, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstraße 27, Bielefeld, D-33615, Germany. htegetme@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de.
Bielefeld University · DEUniversitat de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnaerobic digestion is a biological process in which a consortium of microorganisms transforms a complex substrate into methane and carbon dioxide. A good understanding of the interactions between the populations that form this consortium can contribute to a successful anaerobic digestion of the substrate. In this study we combine the analysis of the biogas production in a laboratory anaerobic digester fed with the microalgae Spirulina, a protein rich substrate, with the analysis of the metagenome of the consortium responsible for digestion, obtained by high-throughput DNA sequencing. The obtained metagenome was also compared with a metagenome from a full scale biogas plant fed with cellulose rich material.

resultsThe optimal organic loading rate for the anaerobic digestion of Spirulina was determined to be 4.0 g Spirulina L(-1) day(-1) with a specific biogas production of 350 mL biogas g Spirulina (-1) with a methane content of 68 %. Firmicutes dominated the microbial consortium at 38 % abundance followed by Bacteroidetes, Chloroflexi and Thermotogae. Euryarchaeota represented 3.5 % of the total abundance. The most abundant organism (14.9 %) was related to Tissierella, a bacterium known to use proteinaceous substrates for growth. Methanomicrobiales and Methanosarcinales dominated the archaeal community. Compared to the full scale cellulose-fed digesters, Pfam domains related to protein degradation were more frequently detected and Pfam domains related to cellulose degradation were less frequent in our sample.

conclusionsThe results presented in this study suggest that Spirulina is a suitable substrate for the production of biogas. The proteinaceous substrate appeared to have a selective impact on the bacterial community that performed anaerobic digestion. A direct influence of the substrate on the selection of specific methanogenic populations was not observed.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacteroidetesBiofuelsBioreactorsCelluloseChloroflexiDNA, BacterialDNA, FungalEuryarchaeotaHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMetagenomeMethanomicrobialesMethanosarcinalesPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNASpirulinaBiofuelsCelluloseDNA, BacterialDNA, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID26680455
PMCPMC4683858
OpenAlexW2210461468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.