ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2015
[An intervention research program (AAPRISS) to reduce social inequalities in health: methods and validation].
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Do the key functions of an intervention designed from the same specifications vary according to context? Investigating the transferability of a public health intervention in France.Implementation science : IS · 2019Article
- Enabling the transferability of complex interventions: exploring the combination of an intervention's key functions and implementation.International journal of public health · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe AAPRISS intervention-research program (Apprendre et Agir Pour Réduire les Inégalités Sociales de Santé) aims to change prevention projects to improve the extent to which they take health inequalities into account. The goal is to assess a project's feasibility and its acceptability, from the viewpoint of the sponsors of the project in question, and to present its tools and potentially-transferable elements.
participantsFive cancer-prevention projects focused on nutrition have been included in the AAPRISS program: two projects conducted in school, one community-health project conducted in a disadvantaged neighbourhood and two hospital therapeutic-education programes. For each one, a workgroup was created bringing together the project sponsors and their team as well as researchers from various disciplines. LOCATION: The study involves projects currently underway in the Midi- Pyrénées region of France.
interventionAAPRISS is based on the exchange of knowledge among project sponsors and researchers and the co-construction of the analysis, reorientations and the assessment of the prevention projects included in the program. The validation of the program and its feasibility from the project sponsors' point of view is based on a questionnaire and presentations carried out during a symposium that took place in May 2014 in Toulouse.
resultsTwelve key program functions have been described. They have been shown to be feasible and acceptable and concrete project modifications towards a better consideration of social inequalities of health (SIH) have been realized in most of the projects. Co-construction among the stakeholders raises many issues and difficulties that could have been overcome by the establishment of a relationship of trust between project sponsors and researchers.
conclusionThe complexity of the determinants leading to SIH calls for programs that revisit existing projects rather than a new intervention aimed at reducing them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.