ArticleExpert review of medical devices2016
Lagrangian methods for blood damage estimation in cardiovascular devices--How numerical implementation affects the results.
Article in Expert review of medical devices, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational and Experimental Evaluation of a Flow-Conditioning Anastomotic Device for Arteriovenous Fistula Maturation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From Early Models to Emerging Trends: The Evolution of Computational Hemolysis Prediction.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Analysis of fibrocalcific aortic valve stenosis: computational pre-and-post TAVR haemodynamics behaviours.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Hemodynamic Effects of Subaortic Stenosis on Blood Flow Characteristics of a Mechanical Heart Valve Based on OpenFOAM Simulation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Mild Paravalvular Leak May Pose an Increased Thrombogenic Risk in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) Patients-Insights from Patient Specific In Vitro and In Silico Studies.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A New Mathematical Numerical Model to Evaluate the Risk of Thrombosis in Three Clinical Ventricular Assist Devices.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Numerical models for assessing the risk of leaflet thrombosis post-transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation.Royal Society open science · 2020Article
- Numerical evaluation of transcatheter aortic valve performance during heart beating and its post-deployment fluid-structure interaction analysis.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2020Article
- Large-Eddy Simulations of Flow in the FDA Benchmark Nozzle Geometry to Predict Hemolysis.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2020Article
- Circulatory loop design and components introduce artifacts impacting in vitro evaluation of ventricular assist device thrombogenicity: A call for caution.Artificial organs · 2020Article
- New Insights into Valve Hemodynamics.Rambam Maimonides medical journal · 2020Review
- Patient-specific simulation of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: impact of deployment options on paravalvular leakage.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2019Article
- Device Thrombogenicity Emulation: An In Silico Predictor of In Vitro and In Vivo Ventricular Assist Device Thrombogenicity.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Original article submission: Platelet stress accumulation analysis to predict thrombogenicity of an artificial kidney.Journal of biomechanics · 2018Article
- High Frequency Components of Hemodynamic Shear Stress Profiles are a Major Determinant of Shear-Mediated Platelet Activation in Therapeutic Blood Recirculating Devices.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Utilizing Computational Fluid Dynamics in Cardiovascular Engineering and Medicine-What You Need to Know. Its Translation to the Clinic/Bedside.Artificial organs · 2017Article
- Anticoagulant independent mechanical heart valves: viable now or still a distant holy grail.Annals of translational medicine · 2016Article
- Combined In Silico and In Vitro Approach Predicts Low Wall Shear Stress Regions in a Hemofilter that Correlate with Thrombus Formation In Vivo.ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper evaluated the influence of various numerical implementation assumptions on predicting blood damage in cardiovascular devices using Lagrangian methods with Eulerian computational fluid dynamics. The implementation assumptions that were tested included various seeding patterns, stochastic walk model, and simplified trajectory calculations with pathlines. Post processing implementation options that were evaluated included single passage and repeated passages stress accumulation and time averaging. This study demonstrated that the implementation assumptions can significantly affect the resulting stress accumulation, i.e., the blood damage model predictions. Careful considerations should be taken in the use of Lagrangian models. Ultimately, the appropriate assumptions should be considered based the physics of the specific case and sensitivity analysis, similar to the ones presented here, should be employed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.