Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26679707›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2016

Reproductive Life Planning: A Cross-Sectional Study of What College Students Know and Believe.

Lisa N Kransdorf, T S Raghu, Juliana M Kling, Paru S David, Suneela Vegunta, Jo Knatz, Allan Markus, Keith A Frey, Yu-Hui H Chang, Anita P Mayer and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lisa N KransdorfDivision of Women's Health Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 13737 N. 92nd Street, Scottsdale, AZ, 85260, USA. kransdorf.lisa@mayo.edu.
T S RaghuDepartment of Information Systems, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Juliana M KlingDivision of Women's Health Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 13737 N. 92nd Street, Scottsdale, AZ, 85260, USA.
Paru S DavidDivision of Women's Health Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 13737 N. 92nd Street, Scottsdale, AZ, 85260, USA.
Suneela VeguntaDivision of Women's Health Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 13737 N. 92nd Street, Scottsdale, AZ, 85260, USA.
Jo KnatzStudent Health Services, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Allan MarkusStudent Health Services, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Keith A FreyDignity Health, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Yu-Hui H ChangDepartment of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Anita P MayerDivision of Women's Health Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 13737 N. 92nd Street, Scottsdale, AZ, 85260, USA.
Julia A FilesDivision of Women's Health Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 13737 N. 92nd Street, Scottsdale, AZ, 85260, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends a reproductive life plan (RLP) to promote individual responsibility for preconception health. The objectives of this study were to determine existing awareness of RLPs in a cohort of reproductive-age adults and to evaluate their knowledge level and beliefs about reproductive life planning. Methods We performed a cross-sectional survey study of adults ages 18-40 years old seeking care at the student health center of a large public university. Participation was voluntary. Survey responses were analyzed by age and gender. Results A total of 559 surveys were collected and analyzed. Only 24 % of participants had heard of an RLP although a majority (62.9 %) agreed that it is important to develop an RLP. Most respondents (85.4 %) preferred to receive information about reproductive life planning from a primary care provider or obstetrician-gynecologist, while only 4.2 % of patients surveyed reported ever being actually asked about an RLP by their healthcare provider. Among those who agreed that an RLP was important, knowledge of specific aspects of an RLP was lacking. Conclusions In our cohort of reproductive-age adults, general health literacy regarding RLPs was poor. Most of the young adults who responded to our survey did not know what an RLP was and even fewer had ever discussed one with their health provider.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePreconception CareAdolescentAdultContraception BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHealth LiteracyHumansMaleStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesUniversitiesFamily planningPreconception careReproductive health

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.