Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26679495›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2015

Facility-based delivery in the context of Zimbabwe's HIV epidemic--missed opportunities for improving engagement with care: a community-based serosurvey.

Raluca Buzdugan, Sandra I McCoy, Karen Webb, Angela Mushavi, Agnes Mahomva, Nancy S Padian, Frances M Cowan

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Male partner involvement and successful completion of the prevention of mother-to-child transmission continuum of care in Kenya.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Raluca BuzduganUniversity of California Berkeley, School of Public Health, 779 University Hall, MS 7360, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA. rbuzdugan@berkeley.edu.
Sandra I McCoyUniversity of California Berkeley, School of Public Health, 779 University Hall, MS 7360, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA. smccoy@berkeley.edu.
Karen WebbUniversity College London, London, United Kingdom. kwebb@ophid.co.zw.
Angela MushaviMinistry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe. mushavia@yahoo.co.uk.
Agnes MahomvaElizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, 107 King George Road, Avondale, Harare, Zimbabwe. amahomva@pedaids.org.
Nancy S PadianUniversity of California Berkeley, School of Public Health, 779 University Hall, MS 7360, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA. nancy.padian@gmail.com.
Frances M CowanUniversity College London, London, United Kingdom. f.cowan@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn developing countries, facility-based delivery is recommended for maternal and neonatal health, and for prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission (PMTCT). However, little is known about whether or not learning one's HIV status affects one's decision to deliver in a health facility. We examined this association in Zimbabwe.

methodsWe analyzed data from a 2012 cross-sectional community-based serosurvey conducted to evaluate Zimbabwe's accelerated national PMTCT program. Eligible women (≥16 years old and mothers of infants born 9-18 months before the survey) were randomly sampled from the catchment areas of 157 health facilities in five of ten provinces. Participants were interviewed about where they delivered and provided blood samples for HIV testing.

resultsOverall 8796 (77 %) mothers reported facility-based delivery; uptake varied by community (30-100%). The likelihood of facility-based delivery was not associated with maternal HIV status. Women who self-reported being HIV-positive before delivery were as likely to deliver in a health facility as women who were HIV-negative, irrespective of when they learned their status - before (adjusted prevalence ratio (PRa) = 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.00-1.09) or during pregnancy (PRa = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.01-1.09). Mothers who had not accessed antenatal care or tested for HIV were most likely to deliver outside a health facility (69%). Overall, however 77% of home deliveries occurred among women who had accessed antenatal care and were HIV-tested.

conclusionsUptake of facility-based delivery was similar among HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected mothers, which was somewhat unexpected given the substantial technical and financial investment aimed at retaining HIV-positive women in care in Zimbabwe.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery, ObstetricDeveloping CountriesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInfantInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalMass ScreeningPregnancyPrenatal CareSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultZimbabwe

Identifiers

PMID26679495
PMCPMC4683871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.